Measuring the quality of outpatient treatment for schizophrenia

被引:140
作者
Young, AS
Sullivan, G
Burnam, MA
Brook, RH
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Inst Neuropsychiat, Dept Psychiat, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Ctr Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[3] W Los Angeles Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90073 USA
[4] Little Rock Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Little Rock, AR USA
[5] Rand Corp, Hlth Program, Santa Monica, CA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1001/archpsyc.55.7.611
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Consumers and policy makers are increasingly interested in measuring treatment quality. We developed a standardized approach to measuring the quality of outpatient care for schizophrenia and used it to evaluate routine care. Methods: We randomly sampled 224 patients in treatment for schizophrenia at 2 public mental health clinics. Appropriate medication management was defined according to criteria derived from national treatment recommendations, and focused on recent management of symptoms and side effects. Adequate psychosocial care was defined as the recent provision of case management or family management to patients for whom it is indicated. Care was evaluated using patient interviews and medical records abstractions. Results: Although patients at the 2 clinics had similar illnesses, the treatment they received was quite different. In total, 84 (38%) of patients received poor-quality medication management, and 117 (52%) had inadequate psychosocial care. Clinics differed in the proportion of patients receiving poor-quality medication management not attributable to patient factors (28% vs 16%). The clinic with better-quality medication management provided case management to fewer severely ill patients (48% vs 81%). More than half of the cases of poor care would not have been detected if we had used only medical records data. Conclusions: At these clinics, many schizophrenic patients were receiving poor-quality care and most poor care was likely due to factors that can be modified. One approach to improving care begins by developing systems that monitor quality. These systems may require improved medical records and patient-reported symptoms and side effects.
引用
收藏
页码:611 / 617
页数:7
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
*AM PSYCH ASS STEE, 1996, J CLIN PSYCHIAT, V57, P3
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Caring for depression
[3]   A RATING-SCALE FOR DRUG-INDUCED AKATHISIA [J].
BARNES, TRE .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1989, 154 :672-676
[4]   Measuring quality in mental health services - Introduction [J].
Bickman, L ;
Salzer, MS .
EVALUATION REVIEW, 1997, 21 (03) :285-291
[5]  
BOND GR, 1988, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V39, P411
[6]  
BREKKE JS, 1988, HOSP COMMUNITY PSYCH, V39, P946
[7]   Quality of health care .2. Measuring quality of care [J].
Brook, RH ;
McGlynn, EA ;
Cleary, PD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :966-970
[8]   Clozapine: Efficacy and safety [J].
Buchanan, RW .
SCHIZOPHRENIA BULLETIN, 1995, 21 (04) :579-591
[9]   A SELF-RATING SCALE FOR MEASURING NEUROLEPTIC SIDE-EFFECTS - VALIDATION IN A GROUP OF SCHIZOPHRENIC-PATIENTS [J].
DAY, JC ;
WOOD, G ;
DEWEY, M ;
BENTALL, RP .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 1995, 166 :650-653
[10]  
Dixon K, 1997, BEHAV HEALTHC TOM, V6, P67