Transpiration responses to vapor pressure deficit in well watered 'slow-wilting' and commercial soybean

被引:275
作者
Fletcher, Andrew L.
Sinclair, Thomas R.
Allen, L. Hartwell, Jr.
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Agron Physiol Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, USDA ARS, Agron Physiol Lab, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
slow-wilting; soybean; transpiration; vapor pressure deficit;
D O I
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.004
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Slow-wilting has been observed in several soybean genotypes as a phenotypic response to drought stress. This trait has been proposed as useful in improving the yield of soybean under drought conditions, but the exact nature of the trait is unresolved. This research explored the hypothesis that slow-wilting is an expression of soil water conservation that results from a plant-imposed limitation on maximum transpiration rate. Therefore, gas exchange by slow-wilting and commercial genotypes was measured over a range of atmospheric vapor pressured deficit (VPD). Two experiments were undertaken to examine the response by whole plants and by plant canopies. The results showed that indeed the slow-wilting genotypes reached a maximum transpiration rate at a VPD of about 2.0 kPa with little or no further increase in transpiration rate above this value as VPD was increased. In contrast, the commercial cultivars showed continued increases in transpiration rate as VPD was increased above 2.0 kPa. These results indicated that the slow-wilting trait would be especially desirable in low humidity (high VPD) environments where water deficits commonly develop in the later part of the season. In these environments, restricted transpiration rate during the middle of the day with high vapor pressure deficit would result in water conservation allowing for both increased yield and water use efficiency. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:145 / 151
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Carbon dioxide and temperature effects on evapotranspiration and water use efficiency of soybean [J].
Allen, LH ;
Pan, DY ;
Boote, KJ ;
Pickering, NB ;
Jones, JW .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2003, 95 (04) :1071-1081
[4]   Trigonelline concentration in field-grown soybean in response to irrigation [J].
Cho, Y ;
Njiti, VN ;
Chen, X ;
Lightfoot, DA ;
Wood, AJ .
BIOLOGIA PLANTARUM, 2003, 46 (03) :405-410
[5]   STOMATAL RESPONSE TO HUMIDITY IN COMMON BEAN (PHASEOLUS-VULGARIS) - IMPLICATIONS FOR MAXIMUM TRANSPIRATION RATE, WATER-USE EFFICIENCY AND PRODUCTIVITY [J].
COMSTOCK, J ;
EHLERINGER, J .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 20 (06) :669-691
[6]  
GUAFA W, 1993, FIELD CROPS RES, V32, P257, DOI DOI 10.1016/0378-4290(93)90035-L
[7]   Some characteristics of reduced leaf photosynthesis at midday in maize growing in the field [J].
Hirasawa, T ;
Hsiao, TC .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1999, 62 (01) :53-62
[8]   VEGETATIVE GROWTH ANALYSIS OF A DROUGHT-RESISTANT SOYBEAN PLANT INTRODUCTION [J].
HUDAK, CM ;
PATTERSON, RP .
CROP SCIENCE, 1995, 35 (02) :464-471
[9]   Leaf temperature and transpiration of field grown cotton and soybean under arid and humid conditions [J].
Isoda, A ;
Wang, PW .
PLANT PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2002, 5 (03) :224-228
[10]   Radiation-use efficiency response to vapor pressure deficit for maize and sorghum [J].
Kiniry, JR ;
Landivar, JA ;
Witt, M ;
Gerik, TJ ;
Cavero, J ;
Wade, LJ .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1998, 56 (03) :265-270