Molecular and antibiofilm approaches to prosthetic joint infection

被引:195
作者
Trampuz, A
Osmon, DR
Hanssen, AD
Steckelberg, JM
Patel, R
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Infect Dis, Dept Internal Med, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin, Div Clin Microbiol, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Mayo Clin, Dept Orthoped Surg, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.blo.0000087324.60612.93
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The majority of patients with prosthetic joint replacement (arthroplasty) experience dramatic relief of pain and restoration of satisfactory joint function. In the United States, more than .5 million people have a primary arthroplasty each year. Less than 10% of prosthesis recipients have complications develop during their lifetime, commonly as a result of aseptic biomechanical failure, followed by prosthetic joint infection. The pathogenesis of prosthetic joint infection is related to bacteria in biofilms, in which they are protected from antimicrobial killing and host responses rendering these infections difficult to eradicate. Current microbiology laboratory methods for diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection depend on isolation of a pathogen by culture. However, these methods have neither ideal sensitivity nor ideal specificity. Therefore, culture-independent molecular methods have been used to improve the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. In the research setting, detection of 16S ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid by polymerase chain reaction has been used in the molecular diagnosis of prosthetic joint infection. Various antibiofilm strategies directed at disruption of adherent bacteria are the focus of intense research to improve the detection of biofilm organisms and their eradication. In this article, molecular and antibiofilm approaches to prosthetic joint infection are reviewed.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 88
页数:20
相关论文
共 111 条
[1]   Role of nutrient limitation and stationary-phase existence in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin [J].
Anderl, JN ;
Zahller, J ;
Roe, F ;
Stewart, PS .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2003, 47 (04) :1251-1256
[2]   DIAGNOSIS OF INFECTION BY FROZEN-SECTION DURING REVISION ARTHROPLASTY [J].
ATHANASOU, NA ;
PANDEY, R ;
DESTEIGER, R ;
CROOK, D ;
SMITH, PM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1995, 77B (01) :28-33
[3]   Prospective evaluation of criteria for microbiological diagnosis of prosthetic-joint infection at revision arthroplasty [J].
Atkins, BL ;
Athanasou, N ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Crook, DWM ;
Simpson, H ;
Peto, TEA ;
McLardy-Smith, P ;
Berendt, AR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1998, 36 (10) :2932-2939
[4]   THE VALUE OF ASPIRATION OF THE HIP-JOINT BEFORE REVISION TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
BARRACK, RL ;
HARRIS, WH .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1993, 75A (01) :66-76
[5]   The pathology of total joint arthroplasty - II. Mechanisms of implant failure [J].
Bauer, TW ;
Schils, J .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (09) :483-497
[6]   The pathology of total joint arthroplasty I. Mechanisms of implant fixation [J].
Bauer, TW ;
Schils, J .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1999, 28 (08) :423-432
[7]   Detection of differential gene expression in biofilm-forming versus planktonic populations of Staphylococcus aureus using micro-representational-difference analysis [J].
Becker, P ;
Hufnagle, W ;
Peters, G ;
Herrmann, M .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2001, 67 (07) :2958-2965
[8]  
Benov L, 2002, J BIOCHEM MOL BIOL, V35, P428
[9]   Risk factors for prosthetic joint infection: Case-control study [J].
Berbari, EF ;
Hanssen, AD ;
Duffy, MC ;
Steckelberg, JM ;
Ilstrup, DM ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Osmon, DR .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 27 (05) :1247-1254
[10]   IDENTIFICATION OF STAPHYLOCOCCUS-EPIDERMIDIS VASCULAR GRAFT INFECTIONS - A COMPARISON OF CULTURE TECHNIQUES [J].
BERGAMINI, TM ;
BANDYK, DF ;
GOVOSTIS, D ;
VETSCH, R ;
TOWNE, JB .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1989, 9 (05) :665-670