Intensive therapy with inhaled insulin via the AERx insulin diabetes management system

被引:78
作者
Hermansen, K
Rönnemaa, T
Petersen, AH
Bellaire, S
Adamson, U
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Aarhus Kommune Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Turku Univ, Cent Hosp, Turku, Finland
[3] Novo Nordisk AS, DK-2880 Bagsvaerd, Denmark
[4] Karolinska Inst, Danderyds Sjukhus, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
D O I
10.2337/diacare.27.1.162
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - To compare the glycemic control of inhaled insulin via the AERx insulin diabetes management system (iDMS) with that of subcutaneous (SC) insulin, both combined with NPH insulin at bedtime, in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The AERx iDMS uses a liquid insulin formulation to achieve flexible precise mealtime dosing (with increments corresponding to 1 IU administered subcutaneously) and ensures insulin delivery only when the breathing technique is optimal. This trial in patients with type 2 diabetes compared the glycemic control (HbA(1c)) administered via AERx iDMS with that using SC insulin. This was a achieved by inhaled insulin. randomized, 12-week, open-label, parallel, multicenter, multinational trial in 107 nonsmoking patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age 59 years, mean duration of diabetes 11.9 years). Patients were randomized to receive either inhaled fast-acting human insulin via AERx iDMS immediately before meals or SC fast-acting human insulin administered 30 min before meals, both in combination with evening NPH insulin. RESULTS - Baseline and demographic characteristics were similar between the two groups. There was no statistically significant difference in HbA(1c) between the AERx and SC groups after 12 weeks of treatment (7.84 +/- 0.77 vs. 7.76 +/- 0.77%, P = 0.60). Fasting serum glucose was significantly lower in the AERx group compared with the SC group by the end of the trial (8-9 +/- 3.8 vs. 10.8 +/- 3.7 mmol/l, P = 0.01) with a similar NPH dose in the two groups (0.23 vs. 0.23 IU/kg, P = 0.93). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in the intra-subject variability of fasting or prandial blood glucose increment. Adverse events were similar in the two groups. No major safety concerns were raised during the trial. CONCLUSIONS - in patients with type 2 diabetes, preprandial inhaled insulin via AERx iDMS is as effective as preprandial SC insulin injection in achieving glycemic control with similar tolerability.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 167
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
*AM DIAB ASS, 1996, DIABETES CARE S1, V19, pS54
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, DIABETES, V45, P1289
[3]   Dose-response relation of liquid aerosol inhaled insulin in Type I diabetic patients [J].
Brunner, GA ;
Balent, B ;
Ellmerer, M ;
Schaupp, L ;
Siebenhofer, A ;
Jendle, JH ;
Okikawa, J ;
Pieber, TR .
DIABETOLOGIA, 2001, 44 (03) :305-308
[5]   Inhaled human insulin treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus [J].
Cefalu, WT ;
Skyler, JS ;
Kourides, IA ;
Landschulz, WH ;
Balagtas, CC ;
Cheng, SL ;
Gelfand, RA .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (03) :203-207
[6]  
Farr S J, 2000, Diabetes Technol Ther, V2, P185, DOI 10.1089/15209150050025131
[7]   AEROSOL DEPOSITION IN THE HUMAN LUNG FOLLOWING ADMINISTRATION FROM A MICROPROCESSOR-CONTROLLED PRESSURIZED METERED-DOSE INHALER [J].
FARR, SJ ;
ROWE, AM ;
RUBSAMEN, R ;
TAYLOR, G .
THORAX, 1995, 50 (06) :639-644
[8]   Effect of long-term exposure to insulin lispro on the induction of antibody response in patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes [J].
Fineberg, SE ;
Huang, J ;
Brunelle, R ;
Gulliya, KS ;
Anderson, JH .
DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (01) :89-96
[9]  
Gansslen M., 1925, KLIN WOCHENSCHR, V4, P71, DOI [10.1007/BF01748135, DOI 10.1007/BF01748135]
[10]   Health care and health status and outcomes for patients with type 2 diabetes [J].
Harris, MI .
DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (06) :754-758