The Mortality Risk Score and the ADG Score Two Points-Based Scoring Systems for the Johns Hopkins Aggregated Diagnosis Groups to Predict Mortality in a General Adult Population Cohort in Ontario, Canada

被引:126
作者
Austin, Peter C. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Walraven, Carl [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Inst Clin Evaluat Sci, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Dept Hlth Management Policy & Evaluat, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
[4] Univ Ottawa, Ottawa Hosp Res Inst, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[5] Univ Ottawa, Dept Med, Ottawa, ON, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
comorbidity; administrative data; Aggregated Diagnosis Groups; Adjusted Clinical Groups; health services research; point-scoring system; ADMINISTRATIVE DATA; COMORBIDITY INDEX; ICD-9-CM;
D O I
10.1097/MLR.0b013e318229360e
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Logistic regression models that incorporated age, sex, and indicator variables for the Johns Hopkins' Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) categories have been shown to accurately predict all-cause mortality in adults. Objectives: To develop 2 different point-scoring systems using the ADGs. The Mortality Risk Score (MRS) collapses age, sex, and the ADGs to a single summary score that predicts the annual risk of all-cause death in adults. The ADG Score derives weights for the individual ADG diagnosis groups. Research Design: Retrospective cohort constructed using population- based administrative data. Participants: All 10,498,413 residents of Ontario, Canada, between the age of 20 and 100 years who were alive on their birthday in 2007, participated in this study. Participants were randomly divided into derivation and validation samples. Measures: Death within 1 year. Results: In the derivation cohort, the MRS ranged from -21 to 139 (median value 29, IQR 17 to 44). In the validation group, a logistic regression model with the MRS as the sole predictor significantly predicted the risk of 1-year mortality with a c-statistic of 0.917. A regression model with age, sex, and the ADG Score has similar performance. Both methods accurately predicted the risk of 1-year mortality across the 20 vigintiles of risk. Conclusions: The MRS combined values for a person's age, sex, and the John Hopkins ADGs to accurately predict 1-year mortality in adults. The ADG Score is a weighted score representing the presence or absence of the 32 ADG diagnosis groups. These scores will facilitate health services researchers conducting risk adjustment using administrative health care databases.
引用
收藏
页码:940 / 947
页数:8
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Using the Johns Hopkins Aggregated Diagnosis Groups (ADGs) to Predict Mortality in a General Adult Population Cohort in Ontario, Canada [J].
Austin, Peter C. ;
van Walraven, Carl ;
Wodchis, Walter P. ;
Newman, Alice ;
Anderson, Geoffrey M. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2011, 49 (10) :932-939
[2]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[3]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[4]   Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data [J].
Elixhauser, A ;
Steiner, C ;
Harris, DR ;
Coffey, RN .
MEDICAL CARE, 1998, 36 (01) :8-27
[5]  
HARRELL FE, 2001, LOGISTIC REGRESSION
[6]  
Iron K., 2008, Living and Dying in Ontario: An Opportunity for Improved Health Information
[7]  
Johns Hopkins University, J HOPK ACG CAS MIX A
[8]  
Kralj B, 2009, MEASURING RURALITY R
[9]   Should scoring rules be based on odds ratios or regression coefficients? [J].
Moons, KGM ;
Harrell, FE ;
Steyerberg, EW .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 55 (10) :1054-1055
[10]   Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data [J].
Quan, HD ;
Sundararajan, V ;
Halfon, P ;
Fong, A ;
Burnand, B ;
Luthi, JC ;
Saunders, LD ;
Beck, CA ;
Feasby, TE ;
Ghali, WA .
MEDICAL CARE, 2005, 43 (11) :1130-1139