Influence of the host system on the pathogenicity, immunogenicity, and antigenicity of infectious bursal disease virus

被引:21
作者
Hassan, MK [1 ]
Saif, YM [1 ]
机构
[1] OHIO STATE UNIV,OHIO AGR RES & DEV CTR,FOOD ANIM HLTH RES PROGRAM,WOOSTER,OH 44691
关键词
D O I
10.2307/1592263
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
The effect of the host system on the pathogenicity, immunogenicity, and antigenicity of infectious bursal disease virus (IBDV) was investigated. One classic (SAL) and one variant strain (IN) of IBDV were passaged separately six rimes in three host systems, namely BGM-70 continuous cell line, primary chicken embryo fibroblast (CEF) cells, or embryonating chicken eggs (embryos) or one time in the bursa of Fabricius (BF) of specific-pathogen-free (SPF) chickens. Passage in BGM-70 cells or CEF cells resulted in loss of pathogenicity bur viruses passaged in embryos or BF maintained their pathogenicity For the immunogenicity study, the viruses described above were used to prepare live and inactivated vaccines, containing 10(3) mean embryo infectious doses (EID(50)s) and 10(5) EID(50)s respectively. These vaccines induced different levels of protection. It was concluded that the antigen titration methodology employing embryonating chicken eggs was nor suitable for titration of viruses propagated in other host systems because of varying degrees of adaptation and/or pathogenicity of the viruses resulting in variability in antigen mass of the rested vaccines. To rest this assumption, an antigen-capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used as a titration system to compare the antigenicity of viruses propagated in BGM-70 cells or BE Preparations containing similar antigen masses were inactivated then inoculated into two age groups of SPF chickens and antibody titers were monitored. During the experimental period, the geometric mean virus-neutralizing (VN) antibody titers of the vaccinated groups did not differ significantly (P > 0.05).
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 561
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   EVALUATION OF THE IMMUNOGENICITY, STABILITY, PATHOGENICITY, AND IMMUNODEPRESSIVE POTENTIAL OF 4 COMMERCIAL LIVE INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VACCINES [J].
GIAMBRONE, JJ ;
CLAY, RP .
POULTRY SCIENCE, 1986, 65 (07) :1287-1290
[2]   IMMUNOGENICITY OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUSES IN CHICKENS [J].
ISMAIL, NM ;
SAIF, YM .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1991, 35 (03) :460-469
[3]   INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS VARIANT FROM COMMERCIAL LEGHORN PULLETS [J].
ISMAIL, NM ;
SAIF, YM ;
WIGLE, WL ;
HAVENSTEIN, GB ;
JACKSON, C .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1990, 34 (01) :141-145
[4]   REPLICATION OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS IN CONTINUOUS CELL-LINES [J].
JACKWOOD, DH ;
SAIF, YM ;
HUGHES, JH .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1987, 31 (02) :370-375
[5]   GROWTH OF SEROTYPE-I AND SEROTYPE-II AND VARIANT STRAINS OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS IN VERO CELLS [J].
KIBENGE, FSB ;
DHILLON, AS ;
RUSSELL, RG .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1988, 32 (02) :298-303
[6]  
Lukert P. D., 1991, Diseases of poultry., P648
[7]   PATHOGENICITY AND IMMUNOSUPPRESSIVE PROPERTIES OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE INTERMEDIATE STRAINS [J].
MAZARIEGOS, LA ;
LUKERT, PD ;
BROWN, J .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1990, 34 (01) :203-208
[8]   ISOLATION AND SEROLOGICAL STUDIES WITH INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUSES FROM FOWL, TURKEYS AND DUCKS - DEMONSTRATION OF A 2ND SEROTYPE [J].
MCFERRAN, JB ;
MCNULTY, MS ;
MCKILLOP, FR ;
CONNOR, TJ ;
MCCRACKEN, RM ;
COLLINS, DS ;
ALLAN, GM .
AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 1980, 9 (03) :395-404
[9]  
MUSKETT JC, 1985, VACCINE, V3, P309, DOI 10.1016/S0264-410X(85)90161-6
[10]   ISOLATION, IDENTIFICATION, AND PATHOGENICITY OF 2 FIELD STRAINS OF INFECTIOUS BURSAL DISEASE VIRUS [J].
ROSALES, AG ;
VILLEGAS, P ;
LUKERT, PD ;
FLETCHER, OJ ;
MOHAMED, MA ;
BROWN, J .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1989, 33 (01) :35-41