Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks

被引:1267
作者
Luikart, G
Allendorf, FW
Cornuet, JM
Sherwin, WB
机构
[1] URLB, INRA, Lab Modelisat & Biol Evolut, Montpellier, France
[2] Univ New S Wales, Sch Biol Sci, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[3] Univ Montana, Div Biol Sci, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jhered/89.3.238
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
We use population genetics theory and computer simulations to demonstrate that population bottlenecks cause a characteristic mode-shift distortion in the distribution of allele frequencies at selectively neutral loci. Bottlenecks cause alleles at low frequency (<0.1) to become less abundant than alleles in one or more intermediate allele frequency class (e.g., 0.1-0.2), This distortion is transient and likely to be detectable for only a few dozen generations, Consequently only recent bottlenecks are likely to be detected by tests for distortions in distributions of allele frequencies. We illustrate and evaluate a qualitative graphical method for detecting a bottleneck-induced distortion of allele frequency distributions. The simple novel method requires no information on historical population sizes or levels of genetic variation; it requires only samples of 5 to 20 polymorphic loci and approximately 30 individuals. The graphical method often differentiates between empirical datasets from bottlenecked and nonbottlenecked natural populations. Computer simulations show that the graphical method is likely (P > .80) to detect an allele frequency distortion after a bottleneck of less than or equal to 20 breeding individuals when 8 to 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci are analyzed.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 247
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Microsatellite variation in grey seals (Halichoerus grypus) shows evidence of genetic differentiation between two British breeding colonies
    Allen, PJ
    Amos, W
    Pomeroy, PP
    Twiss, SD
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 1995, 4 (06) : 653 - 662
  • [2] GENETIC DRIFT AND THE LOSS OF ALLELES VERSUS HETEROZYGOSITY
    ALLENDORF, FW
    [J]. ZOO BIOLOGY, 1986, 5 (02) : 181 - 190
  • [3] BACKUS VL, 1995, CONSERV BIOL, V9, P1216, DOI 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1995.9051208.x-i1
  • [4] BAKER AJ, 1987, EVOLUTION, V41, P525, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05823.x
  • [5] BANCROFT DR, 1995, PHILOS T ROY SOC LON, V347, P235
  • [6] EFFECT OF POPULATION-SIZE ON GENETIC-VARIATION IN A DIOECIOUS CONIFER
    BILLINGTON, HL
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1991, 5 (01) : 115 - 119
  • [7] BRAKEFIELD PM, 1994, EXS, V68, P165
  • [8] RAPID LOSS OF GENETIC-VARIATION IN LARGE CAPTIVE POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA FLIES - IMPLICATIONS FOR THE GENETIC MANAGEMENT OF CAPTIVE POPULATIONS
    BRISCOE, DA
    MALPICA, JM
    ROBERTSON, A
    SMITH, GJ
    FRANKHAM, R
    BANKS, RG
    BARKER, JSF
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1992, 6 (03) : 416 - 425
  • [9] BRYANT EH, 1986, GENETICS, V114, P1191
  • [10] BUCHNER JK, 1960, WILDLIFE MONOGR, V4, P1191