Attentional interference at small spatial separations

被引:171
作者
Bahcall, DO [1 ]
Kowler, E [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Psychol, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
关键词
attention; attentional window; center surround organization; letter recognition; spatial attention;
D O I
10.1016/S0042-6989(98)00090-X
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The spatial characteristics of attention were studied by measuring the accuracy with which two target letters could be identified from a circular display of 24 characters. Traditional notions of spatially-limited regions of attentional enhancement predict that performance should be best when the pair of targets fall within the boundaries of a single attentional 'window'. The results were opposite to this expectation: performance was poorest when the targets were close together and improved with increasing target separation. The effects were not due to lateral sensory masking or to sensory transients and were replicated with several different types of attentional cues. Two possible models are proposed to account for the observed effects of target separation. The first model assumes that attending to one location necessarily reduces processing in the local surround. The second model proposes that the poorer performance observed at small target separations results from imprecise targeting when attention is directed to a pair of nearby locations. Both models illustrate spatially-local limits on processing capacity that attention is unable to circumvent. Enhancement at one location is achieved primarily at the expense of the immediate surround. Such spatially-local tradeoffs in processing capacity could have the useful consequence of making the attended target stand out even more against the immediate background. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 86
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
BAHCALL D, 1995, INVESTIGATIVE OPHT S, V36, P901
[2]   MEMORY REPRESENTATIONS IN NATURAL TASKS [J].
BALLARD, DH ;
HAYHOE, MM ;
PELZ, JB .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 7 (01) :66-80
[3]   INTERACTION EFFECTS IN PARAFOVEAL LETTER RECOGNITION [J].
BOUMA, H .
NATURE, 1970, 226 (5241) :177-&
[4]   Flexibility in spatial attention before and after practice [J].
Cave, KR ;
Zimmerman, JM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (05) :399-403
[5]   VISUAL PROPERTIES OF NEURONS IN AREA V4 OF THE MACAQUE - SENSITIVITY TO STIMULUS FORM [J].
DESIMONE, R ;
SCHEIN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1987, 57 (03) :835-868
[6]   Saccade target selection and object recognition: Evidence for a common attentional mechanism [J].
Deubel, H ;
Schneider, WX .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (12) :1827-1837
[8]   THE FUNCTION OF VISUAL-SEARCH AND MEMORY IN SEQUENTIAL LOOKING TASKS [J].
EPELBOIM, J ;
STEINMAN, RM ;
KOWLER, E ;
EDWARDS, M ;
PIZLO, Z ;
ERKELENS, CJ ;
COLLEWIJN, H .
VISION RESEARCH, 1995, 35 (23-24) :3401-3422
[9]   EFFECTS OF NOISE LETTERS UPON IDENTIFICATION OF A TARGET LETTER IN A NONSEARCH TASK [J].
ERIKSEN, BA ;
ERIKSEN, CW .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1974, 16 (01) :143-149
[10]   EXTENT OF PROCESSING OF NOISE ELEMENTS DURING SELECTIVE ENCODING FROM VISUAL-DISPLAYS [J].
ERIKSEN, CW ;
HOFFMAN, JE .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1973, 14 (01) :155-160