Root architecture affects nitrate leaching from bentgrass turf

被引:75
作者
Bowman, DC [1 ]
Devitt, DA
Engelke, MC
Rufty, TW
机构
[1] N Carolina State Univ, Dept Crop Sci, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
[2] Univ Nevada, Dept Environm & Resource Sci, Reno, NV 89512 USA
[3] Texas A&M Univ, Res & Ext Ctr, Dallas, TX 75252 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800060036x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Understanding the determinants of nitrate leaching should improve nitrogen uptake efficiency and reduce ground water contamination. This column lysimeter study examined the effect of root architecture on NO3 leaching from two genotypes of creeping bentgrass (Agrostis palustris Huds.) differing in rooting characteristics. Ammonium nitrate was applied (50 kg N ha(-1)) and the columns were irrigated dth 1, 2 or 3 em day(-1) (Exp. 1) or irrigation was delayed 1, 3 or 5 d (Exp. 2). In Exp. 1, leachate NO3 concentrations and total N leached from the shallow-rooted (SR) genotype were approximately twice those from the deep-rooted (DR) genotype. An average of 38 and 18% of the applied N leached from the SR and DR genotypes, respectively. Cumulative leaching losses increased with irrigation depth. In Exp. 2, NO3 leaching was reduced 90% or more by increasing the time period for immobilization from 1 to 5 d. Recovery of applied N-15 in the tissue averaged 87% after 2 mo. Absorption of NO3 and NH4 was measured in nutrient solution culture. The SR genotype had significantly higher uptake rates than DR for both forms of N, expressed on a root weight basis. Collectively these data indicate that a deep-rooted turfgrass absorbs N more efficiently than a shallow-rooted turf, reducing the concentration and total amount of NO3 leached. The effect is apparently not due to differences in N uptake, but rather to rooting patterns. Environmental conditions and management practices that affect roofing depth and density may thus affect N nutrition and NO3 leaching.
引用
收藏
页码:1633 / 1639
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BOWMAN DC, 1989, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V114, P421
[2]  
BOWMAN DC, 1989, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V114, P229
[3]   NITROGEN-SOURCE EFFECT ON NITRATE AND AMMONIUM LEACHING AND RUNOFF LOSSES FROM GREENS [J].
BROWN, KW ;
THOMAS, JC ;
DUBLE, RL .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1982, 74 (06) :947-950
[4]   CONTINUOUS-FLOW REDUCTION OF NITRATE TO AMMONIA WITH ANTIGRANULOCYTES ZINC [J].
CARLSON, RM .
ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY, 1986, 58 (07) :1590-1591
[5]   ABSORPTION OF NITRATE AND AMMONIUM-IONS BY LOLIUM-PERENNE FROM FLOWING SOLUTION CULTURES AT LOW ROOT TEMPERATURES [J].
CLARKSON, DT ;
JONES, LHP ;
PURVES, JV .
PLANT CELL AND ENVIRONMENT, 1992, 15 (01) :99-106
[6]   NITRATE-NITROGEN MOVEMENT THROUGH SOIL AS AFFECTED BY SOIL PROFILE CHARACTERISTICS [J].
DEVITT, D ;
LETEY, J ;
LUND, LJ ;
BLAIR, JW .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1976, 5 (03) :283-288
[7]  
DUFF DT, 1997, INT TURF SOC RES J, V8, P546
[8]   THE EFFECTS OF ESTABLISHMENT METHODS AND FERTILIZATION PRACTICES ON NITRATE LEACHING FROM TURFGRASS [J].
GERON, CA ;
DANNEBERGER, TK ;
TRAINA, SJ ;
LOGAN, TJ ;
STREET, JR .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 1993, 22 (01) :119-125
[9]  
GOLD AJ, 1990, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V45, P305
[10]  
HOAGLAND DR, 1950, CALIF AGR EXP STA CI, V347