Nirvana efficiency: a comparative test of residual claims and routines

被引:32
作者
Knott, AM
McKelvey, B
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Wharton Sch, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Anderson Sch, Los Angeles, CA USA
关键词
efficiency; routines; residual claims; agency theory; franchise;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-2681(99)00016-5
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Two widely adopted views of firm efficiency are agency theorists' residual claims and organization theorists' routines. The agency view holds that ownership structures (and their proxies) are the primary source of efficiency differences between firms. The organization theory view holds that organizational routines are the primary source of efficiency differences between firms. We conduct an empirical test that compares the relative value of residual claims and routines in generating firm efficiency, while controlling other factors. We find support for both views, but more importantly find that the average value of routines is roughly an order of magnitude higher than residual claims. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:365 / 383
页数:19
相关论文
共 62 条
[2]  
[Anonymous], J EC STUD
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1987, COMPETITIVE CHALLENG
[4]  
[Anonymous], BUSINESS LEADERSHIP
[5]  
[Anonymous], HDB ORG DESIGN
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1987, COMPETITIVE CHALLENG
[7]  
Barnard C. I., 1938, The Functions of the Executive
[8]  
BAUMOL WJ, 1962, AM ECON REV, V52, P1078
[9]  
Berle AdolfA., 1991, MODERN CORPORATION P
[10]   PRICE, AUTHORITY, AND TRUST - FROM IDEAL TYPES TO PLURAL FORMS [J].
BRADACH, JL ;
ECCLES, RG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1989, 15 :97-118