The emergency department utility of Simplify D-dimer™ to exclude pulmonary embolism in patients with pleuritic chest pain

被引:24
作者
Hogg, K [1 ]
Dawson, D [1 ]
Mackway-Jones, K [1 ]
机构
[1] Manchester Royal Infirm, Emergency Dept, Emergency Med Res Grp, Manchester M13 9WL, Lancs, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.03.018
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Pleuritic chest pain is a common presenting complaint in the emergency department (ED) and a symptom of pulmonary embolism. Patients with pleuritic chest pain would benefit from a simple and rapid way of screening for pulmonary embolism. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of Simplify D-dimer(TM) as a rule-out tool for pulmonary embolism in ED patients with pleuritic chest pain. Methods: This was a prospective diagnostic study in a large city-center ED. Four hundred twenty-five patients with pleuritic chest pain were prospectively recruited between February 2002 and June 2003. Simplify D-dimer(TM) testing was performed on each patient in the ED. All patients followed an independent reference standard diagnostic algorithm for pulmonary embolism. Each patient was followed up clinically for 3 months. Results: The calculated sensitivity of Simplify D-dimer(TM) for pulmonary embolism was 81.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61.4% to 92.7%), and specificity was 74.2% (95% CI 69.6% to 78.4%). The negative predictive value was 98.6% (95% CI 96.6% to 99.6%), positive predictive value 15.0% (95% CI 9.1% to 22.7%), negative likelihood ratio 0.25 (95% CI 0.10 to 0.52) and positive likelihood ratio 3.17 (95% CI 2.30 to 3.97). The study cohort pretest probability was 5.3%. A negative Simplify result reduced the posttest probability to 1.3% (95% CI 0.5% to 3.4%). Conclusion: The Simplify D-dimer(TM) is not sufficiently sensitive to exclude the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in all patients presenting to the ED with pleuritic chest pain.
引用
收藏
页码:305 / 310
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Approximate is better than "exact" for interval estimation of binomial proportions [J].
Agresti, A ;
Coull, BA .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1998, 52 (02) :119-126
[2]   MORTALITY IN PATIENTS TREATED FOR PULMONARY-EMBOLISM [J].
ALPERT, JS ;
SMITH, R ;
CARLSON, CJ ;
OCKENE, IS ;
DEXTER, L ;
DALEN, JE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 236 (13) :1477-1480
[3]  
[Anonymous], THROMB RES
[4]   A latex D-dimer reliably excludes venous thromboembolism [J].
Bates, SM ;
Grand'Maison, A ;
Johnston, M ;
Naguit, I ;
Kovacs, MJ ;
Ginsberg, JS .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 161 (03) :447-453
[5]   The accuracy of the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay D-dimer test in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism: A meta-analysis [J].
Brown, MD ;
Rowe, BH ;
Reeves, MJ ;
Bermingham, JM ;
Goldhaber, SZ .
ANNALS OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 40 (02) :133-144
[6]   A new rapid bedside assay for D-dimer measurement (Simplify D-dimer) in the diagnostic work-up for deep vein thrombosis [J].
Cini, M ;
Legnani, C ;
Cavallaroni, K ;
Bettini, F ;
Palareti, G .
JOURNAL OF THROMBOSIS AND HAEMOSTASIS, 2003, 1 (12) :2681-2683
[7]  
Curtin N, 2004, Lab Hematol, V10, P88, DOI 10.1532/LH96.04018
[8]   Risk of fatal pulmonary embolism in patients with treated venous thromboembolism [J].
Douketis, JD ;
Kearon, C ;
Bates, S ;
Duku, EK ;
Ginsberg, JS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (06) :458-462
[9]   APPROXIMATE INTERVAL ESTIMATION OF THE RATIO OF BINOMIAL PARAMETERS - A REVIEW AND CORRECTIONS FOR SKEWNESS [J].
GART, JJ ;
NAM, J .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (02) :323-338
[10]  
Ginsberg JS, 1998, ANN INTERN MED, V129, P1006, DOI 10.7326/0003-4819-129-12-199812150-00003