The use of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy in the management of pelvic organ prolapse

被引:53
作者
Gadonneix, P
Ercoli, A
Scambia, G
Villet, R
机构
[1] Hop Diaconesses, Dept Visceral & Gynaecol Surg, F-75571 Paris, France
[2] Univ Sacred Heart, Dept Gynaecol, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Catholic Univ, Dept Oncol, I-86100 Campobasso, Italy
关键词
laparoscopic pelvic floor surgery; laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy; mesh; pelvic organ prolapse;
D O I
10.1097/01.gco.0000175355.48802.7b
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Purpose of review This paper aims to review and comment on the developments in laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy published during the last year. Recent findings We classified the findings reported recently in the literature for laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy as technical or tactical findings. Technical findings concern the material of the mesh, the methods of mesh fixation, the use of adapted vaginal retractors and the interest in robotic assistance. Tactical findings consist of specific modifications to the standard surgical procedure aimed at reducing the side effects and complications and ameliorating the effectiveness of this intervention. These modifications include the possibility of avoiding the placement of a posterior mesh and the fixation of the posterior mesh to the puborectal muscles or the perineal body instead of the posterior vaginal wall. A specific section has been dedicated to reviewing and commenting on those interventions associated routinely with laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. Summary Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy is a safe surgical procedure in constant evolution which allows excellent results in the treatment of utero-vaginal prolapse. Large prospective, randomized studies comparing the different technical and tactical modifications recently introduced are needed in order to further enhance the effectiveness of this intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:376 / 380
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Laparoscopic promontory sacral colpopexy: Is the posterior, recto-vaginal, mesh mandatory? [J].
Antiphon, P ;
Elard, S ;
Benyoussef, A ;
Fofana, M ;
Yiou, R ;
Gettman, M ;
Hoznek, A ;
Vordos, D ;
Chopin, DK ;
Abbou, CC .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2004, 45 (05) :655-661
[2]  
Boukerrou M, 2003, J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), V32, P524
[3]   Risk of mesh erosion with sacral colpopexy and concurrent hysterectomy [J].
Brizzolara, S ;
Pillai-Allen, A .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 102 (02) :306-310
[4]   Long-term results of the Burch procedure combined with abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vault prolapse [J].
Cosson, M ;
Boukerrou, M ;
Narducci, F ;
Occelli, B ;
Querleu, D ;
Crépin, G .
INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL AND PELVIC FLOOR DYSFUNCTION, 2003, 14 (02) :104-107
[5]   Rejection of stapled prosthetic mesh after laparoscopic sacropexy [J].
Cosson M. ;
Vinatier D. ;
Rajabally R. ;
Querleu D. ;
Crepin G. .
International Urogynecology Journal, 1999, 10 (5) :349-350
[6]   Robotic-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse [J].
DiMarco, DS ;
Chow, GK ;
Gettman, MT ;
Elliott, DS .
UROLOGY, 2004, 63 (02) :373-376
[7]   Gynecologic use of robotically assisted laparoscopy: sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of high-grade vaginal vault prolapse [J].
Elliott, DS ;
Frank, I ;
DiMarco, DS ;
Chow, GK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 188 (4A) :52S-56S
[8]   Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with two separate meshes along the anterior and posterior vaginal walls for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Gadonneix, P ;
Ercoli, A ;
Salet-Lizée, D ;
Cotelle, O ;
Bolner, B ;
Van Den Akker, M ;
Villet, R .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2004, 11 (01) :29-35
[9]  
NEZHAT CH, 1994, OBSTET GYNECOL, V84, P885
[10]   Laparoscopic sacral colpopey approach for genito-urinary prolapse: Experience with 363 cases [J].
Rozet, F ;
Mandron, E ;
Arroyo, C ;
Andrews, H ;
Cathelineau, X ;
Mombet, A ;
Cathala, N ;
Vallancien, G .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 47 (02) :230-236