Modelling transport of dissolved silica in a forested headwater catchment: the effect of hydrological and chemical time scales on hysteresis in the concentration-discharge relationship

被引:77
作者
Hornberger, GM [1 ]
Scanlon, TM [1 ]
Raffensperger, JP [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Dept Environm Sci, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
关键词
concentration-discharge relationships; hysteresis; hydrological tracers; silica transport;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.254
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
The relationship between concentration c and discharge Q in a stream is one of the aspects of hydrochemical catchment response that has been used widely as a diagnostic. In particular, loops in the c-e curve, commonly referred to as hysteresis loops, are used to infer particular mixing patterns. At the South Fork of Brokenback Run (SFBR) in the Shenandoah National Park, Virginia, we have evidence that stream dynamics reflect a system composed of an ephemeral subsurface stormflow zone perched above a perennial water table. The relationship between dissolved silica and stream discharge exhibits hysteresis in the clockwise (CW) direction. Modelling this relationship in the context of three-component mixing with constant-concentration end members failed to reproduce the observed c-e pattern. In this paper we examine the possibility that temporal variation in soil-water concentrations of silica can explain how CW hysteresis loops in the c-e curve can arise. In particular, we examine the role of the ratio of a hydrological time scale to a chemical time scale in determining the nature of hysteresis loops. The CW loops that we observe in SFBR can be explained by time variability in soil-water concentrations only if the chemical (leaching) time constant is less than (or only slightly greater than) the hydrological time constant. The near equality of these time constants is consistent with reports from hydrological measurements and leaching experiments. Copyright (C) 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:2029 / 2038
页数:10
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   THE CONTRIBUTION OF THROUGHFLOW TO STORM RUNOFF - AN EVALUATION OF A CHEMICAL MIXING MODEL [J].
ANDERSON, MG ;
BURT, TP .
EARTH SURFACE PROCESSES AND LANDFORMS, 1982, 7 (06) :565-574
[2]  
Beven K.J., 1979, HYDROL SCI B, V24, P43, DOI [DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834, 10.1080/02626667909491834]
[3]   Selected challenges in runoff generation research in forests from the hillslope to headwater drainage basin scale [J].
Bonell, M .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 1998, 34 (04) :765-785
[4]  
Boyer EW, 1997, HYDROL PROCESS, V11, P1635, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19971015)11:12&lt
[5]  
1635::AID-HYP494&gt
[6]  
3.0.CO
[7]  
2-H
[8]   The role of event water, a rapid shallow flow component, and catchment size in summer stormflow [J].
Brown, VA ;
McDonnell, JJ ;
Burns, DA ;
Kendall, C .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1999, 217 (3-4) :171-190
[9]  
Buttle JM, 1997, HYDROL PROCESS, V11, P557, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199705)11:6<557::AID-HYP477>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-Y