Optimal control-based efficient synthesis of building blocks of quantum algorithms:: A perspective from network complexity towards time complexity -: art. no. 042331

被引:136
作者
Schulte-Herbrüggen, T
Spörl, A
Khaneja, N
Glaser, SJ
机构
[1] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Chem, D-85747 Garching, Germany
[2] Harvard Univ, Div Appl Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevA.72.042331
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
In this paper, we demonstrate how optimal control methods can be used to speed up the implementation of modules of quantum algorithms or quantum simulations in networks of coupled qubits. The gain is most prominent in realistic cases, where the qubits are not all mutually coupled. Thus the shortest times obtained depend on the coupling topology as well as on the characteristic ratio of the time scales for local controls vs nonlocal (i.e., coupling) evolutions in the specific experimental setting. Relating these minimal times to the number of qubits gives the tightest known upper bounds to the actual time complexity of the quantum modules. As will be shown, time complexity is a more realistic measure of the experimental cost than the usual gate complexity. In the limit of fast local controls (as, e.g., in NMR), time-optimized realizations are shown for the quantum Fourier transform (QFT) and the multiply controlled NOT gate (Cn-1NOT) in various coupling topologies of n qubits. The speed-ups are substantial: in a chain of six qubits the quantum Fourier transform so far obtained by optimal control is more than eight times faster than the standard decomposition into controlled phase, Hadamard and SWAP gates, while the Cn-1NOT gate for a completely coupled network of six qubits is nearly seven times faster.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Alber G., 2000, SPRINGER TRACTS MODE, V173
[2]   Notions of controllability for bilinear multilevel quantum systems [J].
Albertini, F ;
D'Alessandro, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2003, 48 (08) :1399-1403
[3]   ELEMENTARY GATES FOR QUANTUM COMPUTATION [J].
BARENCO, A ;
BENNETT, CH ;
CLEVE, R ;
DIVINCENZO, DP ;
MARGOLUS, N ;
SHOR, P ;
SLEATOR, T ;
SMOLIN, JA ;
WEINFURTER, H .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 1995, 52 (05) :3457-3467
[4]  
BETH T, 1984, VERFAHREN SCHNELLEN
[5]   Quantum network optimization [J].
Blais, A .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2001, 64 (02) :5
[6]   DETERMINATION OF THE TRANSITIVITY OF BILINEAR SYSTEMS [J].
BOOTHBY, WM ;
WILSON, EN .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 1979, 17 (02) :212-221
[7]   SYSTEM THEORY ON GROUP MANIFOLDS AND COSET SPACES [J].
BROCKETT, RW .
SIAM JOURNAL ON CONTROL, 1972, 10 (02) :265-&
[8]   LIE THEORY AND CONTROL-SYSTEMS DEFINED ON SPHERES [J].
BROCKETT, RW .
SIAM JOURNAL ON APPLIED MATHEMATICS, 1973, 25 (02) :213-225
[9]  
BUTHKOSKIY AG, 1990, CONTROL QUANTUM MECH
[10]   Lower bounds on the complexity of simulating quantum gates [J].
Childs, AM ;
Haselgrove, HL ;
Nielsen, MA .
PHYSICAL REVIEW A, 2003, 68 (05) :6