Influence of different footwear on force of landing during running

被引:29
作者
Cheung, Roy T. H. [1 ]
Ng, Gabriel Y. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hong Kong Polytech Univ, Dept Rehabil Sci, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
PHYSICAL THERAPY | 2008年 / 88卷 / 05期
关键词
D O I
10.2522/ptj.20060323
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and Purpose. Previous studies have demonstrated an increase in foot pronation with mileage in runners. Motion control footwear was designed to check excessive foot motions, but its clinical efficacy, especially in terms of pedographic analysis, has not been well reported. The purposes of this study were to investigate the changes in plantar force in people when running with motion control shoes and to compare pedographic measurements obtained in 2 footwear testing conditions (wearing motion control shoes and wearing neutral shoes) at the beginning and end of a 1.5-km running session. Subjects. Twenty-five recreational runners who had >= 6 degrees of foot pronation participated in the study. Methods. An insole sensor was used to register the plantar force of the subjects before and after running 1.5 km in different shoe conditions. Results. There was no change in the magnitude and distribution pattern of plantar force with the motion control shoes after the 1.5-km run. With the neutral shoes, however, there was an increase in mean peak force under the medial midfoot (364-418 N, 15% increase) and first metatarsal head (524-565 N, 8% increase) toward the end of the running bout. Discussion and Conclusion. The plantar force on the medial foot structures increased with mileage of running with neutral shoes but not with motion control shoes. This finding has implications for injury prevention with footwear selection for recreational runners who have more than 6 degrees of foot pronation.
引用
收藏
页码:620 / 628
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
*AM COLL SPORTS ME, 2006, ACSMS GUID EX TEST P, pCH7
[2]
A comparison of vertical force and temporal parameters produced by an in-shoe pressure measuring system and a force platform (vol 15, pg 781, 2000) [J].
Barnett, S ;
Cunningham, JL ;
West, SE .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 16 (04) :351-+
[4]
CAVANAGH P.R., 1992, INT J CLIN FOOT SCI, V2, P185, DOI [10.1016/0958-2592(92)90047-S, DOI 10.1016/0958-2592(92)90047-S, 10.1016/0958-2592, DOI 10.1016/0958-2592]
[5]
PRESSURE DISTRIBUTION UNDER SYMPTOM-FREE FEET DURING BAREFOOT STANDING [J].
CAVANAGH, PR ;
RODGERS, MM ;
IIBOSHI, A .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1987, 7 (05) :262-276
[6]
Efficacy of motion control shoes for reducing excessive rearfoot motion in fatigued runners [J].
Cheung, Roy T. H. ;
Ng, Gabriel Y. F. .
PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT, 2007, 8 (02) :75-81
[7]
Association of footwear with patellofemoral pain syndrome in runners [J].
Cheung, RTH ;
Ng, GYF ;
Chen, BFC .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2006, 36 (03) :199-205
[8]
CLARKE TE, 1983, MED SCI SPORT EXER, V15, P376
[9]
RUNNING SHOES THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO RUNNING INJURIES [J].
COOK, SD ;
BRINKER, MR ;
POCHE, M .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 1990, 10 (01) :1-8
[10]
THE INFLUENCE OF TIBIALIS ANTERIOR MUSCLE-ACTIVITY ON REARFOOT MOTION DURING WALKING [J].
CORNWALL, MW ;
MCPOIL, TG .
FOOT & ANKLE, 1994, 15 (02) :75-79