Forearm bone mineral density in an unselected population of 2,779 men and women - The HUNT Study, Norway

被引:18
作者
Forsmo, S [1 ]
Langhammer, A
Forsen, L
Schei, B
机构
[1] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Med Tekn Senter, Dept Publ Hlth & Gen Practice, N-7489 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Publ Hlth & Gen Practice, HUNT Res Ctr, Verdal, Norway
[3] Norwegian Inst Publ Hlth, Oslo, Norway
关键词
bone density; densitometry; forearm; osteoporosis; population; prevalence;
D O I
10.1007/s00198-004-1726-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The fracture incidence in Norway is among the highest in Europe, presumably due to osteoporosis. As part of a multipurpose health study in the county of Nord-Trondelag, Norway ( the HUNT study), a 5% randomly selected sample (n= 4,646) of the population > 19 years of age was invited to undergo single X-ray absorptiometry (SXA) of the forearm. A total of 1,274 men (50.5 years) and 1,505 women (49.9 years) participated (60%). The aim of the study was to describe the variation in bone mineral density (BMD) and the prevalence of forearm BMD 2.5 standard deviations (SD) below the mean value for young adults in an unselected population sample. In women the BMD remained stable until the age of 50 years, whereupon a strong decline in BMD was observed. In men, a BMD increase was observed until about the age of 40 years; the decline after the age of 65 was, however, similar to that in women. Based on age and gender-specific reference values, the age-adjusted prevalence of T-scores <) 2.5 SD in women and men aged 50 - 69 years was 16.0% and 5.6%, respectively. In the age group of 70 years or older the prevalence was 65.8% and 30.6% for women and men, respectively. The accelerated BMD reduction in women aged 50 - 65 explains the higher prevalence of T-score < -2.5 SD in elderly women than in men. Further studies on bone loss and falls are required to explain the high fracture incidence in Norway.
引用
收藏
页码:562 / 567
页数:6
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Screening for osteopenia and osteoporosis: Do the accepted normal ranges lead to overdiagnosis?
    Ahmed, AIH
    Blake, GM
    Rymer, JM
    Fogelman, I
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 7 (05) : 432 - 438
  • [2] Quantitative bone mineral assessment at the forearm: A review
    Augat, P
    Fuerst, T
    Genant, HK
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 8 (04) : 299 - 310
  • [3] Berntsen GKR, 2001, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V153, P465
  • [4] BLUNT BA, 1994, J BONE MINER RES, V9, P1333
  • [5] BUTZ S, 1994, OSTEOPOROSIS INT, V4, P149
  • [6] Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures
    Cummings, SR
    Melton, LJ
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9319) : 1761 - 1767
  • [7] Do we need to change the WHO definition of osteoporosis?
    Delmas, PD
    [J]. OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 (03) : 189 - 191
  • [8] Cross-sectional and longitudinal assessment of pre- and postmenopausal bone loss with a portable forearm X-ray device: The Ofely study
    Duboeuf, F
    Sornay-Rendu, E
    Garnero, P
    Bourgeaud-Lightot, A
    Delmas, PD
    [J]. BONE, 2000, 26 (02) : 131 - 135
  • [9] A single bone density measurement can predict fractures over 25 years
    Duppe, H
    Gardsell, P
    Nilsson, B
    [J]. CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 60 (02) : 171 - 174
  • [10] Management of male osteoporosis: report of the UK Consensus Group
    Eastell, R
    Boyle, IT
    Compston, J
    Cooper, C
    Fogelman, I
    Francis, RM
    Hosking, DJ
    Purdie, DW
    Ralston, S
    Reeve, J
    Reid, DM
    Russell, RGG
    Stevenson, JC
    [J]. QJM-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 91 (02) : 71 - 92