The evolution of self-compatibility in geographically peripheral populations of Leavenworthia alabamica (Brassicaceae)

被引:144
作者
Busch, JW [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Biol, Bloomington, IN 47405 USA
关键词
Baker's law; Brassicaceae; cedar glades; inbreeding; mating system; pollen limitation; reproductive assurances; self-incompatibility;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.92.9.1503
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Self-compatibility and adaptations to self-fertilization are often found in plant populations at the periphery of species' ranges or on islands. Self-compatibility may predominate in these environments because it provides reproductive assurance when pollinators or availability of mates limits seed production. This possibility was studied in Leavenworthia alabamica, a flowering plant endemic to the southeastern United States. Populations at the center of the species' range retain sporophytic self-incompatibility, but peripheral populations are smaller, self-compatible, and have adaptations for self-fertilization. A reciprocal-transplant experiment was designed to test whether there is pollen limitation of seed set and to examine its strength in central and peripheral populations. Self-compatible genotypes produced more fruit and 17-22% more seed than self-incompatible genotypes in all environments, suggesting that the transition to self-compatibility may be favored by natural selection in all populations inhabited by L. alabamica. Sequence analyses demonstrated that two peripheral populations have 90-100% reductions in genetic variation, consistent with the effects of small population size or historical bottlenecks. Although pollen limitation of seed set occurs in all environments, self-compatibility may evolve at the periphery in L. alabamica because the benefits of reproductive assurance are influenced by Population size or bottlenecks following extinction and colonization.
引用
收藏
页码:1503 / 1512
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]   SELF COMPATIBILITY AND ESTABLISHMENT AFTER LONG DISTANCE DISPERSAL [J].
BAKER, HG .
EVOLUTION, 1955, 9 (03) :347-349
[2]  
BAKER HG, 1967, EVOLUTION, V21, P853, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03440.x
[3]   The evolution of plant sexual diversity [J].
Barrett, SCH .
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS, 2002, 3 (04) :274-284
[4]   The comparative biology of pollination and mating in flowering plants [J].
Barrett, SCH ;
Harder, LD ;
Worley, AC .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1996, 351 (1345) :1271-1280
[5]  
BARRETT SCH, 1989, EVOLUTION, V43, P1398, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1989.tb02591.x
[6]  
BARRETT SCH, 1987, EVOLUTION, V41, P340, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1987.tb05802.x
[7]   A FLORISTIC PLANT ECOLOGY STUDY OF THE LIMESTONE GLADES OF NORTHERN ALABAMA [J].
BASKIN, JM ;
WEBB, DH ;
BASKIN, CC .
BULLETIN OF THE TORREY BOTANICAL CLUB, 1995, 122 (03) :226-242
[8]  
BATEMAN A. J., 1955, HEREDITY, V9, P53, DOI 10.1038/hdy.1955.2
[9]   ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ABUNDANCE AND DISTRIBUTION OF SPECIES [J].
BROWN, JH .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 124 (02) :255-279
[10]  
BURD M, 1994, BOT REV, V60, P83, DOI 10.1007/BF02856594