Escitalopram in the treatment of depressed elderly patients

被引:106
作者
Kasper, S
de Swart, H
Andersen, HF
机构
[1] Med Univ Vienna, Dept Gen Psychiat, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
[2] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Int Clin Res, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
D O I
10.1176/appi.ajgp.13.10.884
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 100203 ;
摘要
Objective: Management of depression in elderly patients presents a significant medical challenge, and there is a need for further clinical trials. The authors examined the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram and fluoxetine versus placebo in the treatment of elderly patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Methods: This was an 8-week, randomized, double-blind comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram (10 mg/day) and fluoxetine (20 mg/day), to placebo in elderly patients with MDD, The prospectively defined primary efficacy parameter was the change from baseline in mean Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score at endpoint, using last observation carried forward. Results: The intent-to-treat set comprised 517 patients; the escitalopram group included 173 patients; fluoxetine, 164 patients; and placebo, 180 patients. Mean age was 75 years, with a range of 65 to 93. Formally, this was a 'failed study" (i.e., neither active treatment was superior to placebo), and the efficacy results should, therefore, be interpreted with caution. On the basis of the primary efficacy parameter, fluoxetine showed significantly lower efficacy than both escitalopram and placebo, which were not significantly different from each other Rates of withdrawal because of adverse events/lack of efficacy were: placebo (2.8%/4.4%, respectively), escitalopram (9.8%/1.7%, respectively), and fluoxetine (12.2%/1.8%, respectively), No single adverse event occurred at an incidence >= 10% in escitalopram-treated patients. Conclusions: Both escitalopram and fluoxetine were well tolerated by elderly patients with MDD. Neither demonstrated superior efficacy on primary endpoint versus placebo.
引用
收藏
页码:884 / 891
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Age-related differences in the side effect profile of citalopram [J].
Barak, Y ;
Swartz, M ;
Levy, D ;
Weizman, R .
PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 27 (03) :545-548
[2]   Reducing suicidal ideation and depressive symptoms in depressed older primary care patients - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Bruce, ML ;
Ten Have, TR ;
Reynolds, CF ;
Katz, II ;
Schulberg, HC ;
Mulsant, BH ;
Brown, GK ;
McAvay, GJ ;
Pearson, JL ;
Alexopoulos, GS .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (09) :1081-1091
[3]   Fixed-dose trial of the single isomer SSRI escitalopram in depressed outpatients [J].
Burke, WJ ;
Gergel, I ;
Bose, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (04) :331-336
[4]   Paroxetine and fluoxetine effects on mood and cognitive functions in depressed nondemented elderly patients [J].
Cassano, GB ;
Puca, F ;
Scapicchio, PL ;
Trabucchi, M .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2002, 63 (05) :396-402
[5]  
Cassano P, 2004, Arch Womens Ment Health, V7, P167
[6]  
CROME P, 2000, DRUGS OLDER POPULATI
[7]   Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluoxetine treatment for elderly patients with dysthymic disorder [J].
Devanand, DP ;
Nobler, MS ;
Cheng, J ;
Turret, N ;
Pelton, GH ;
Roose, SP ;
Sackeim, HA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GERIATRIC PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 13 (01) :59-68
[8]  
Evans M, 1997, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V12, P817, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199708)12:8<817::AID-GPS645>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-4
[10]   Course and rate of antidepressant response in the very old [J].
Gildengers, AG ;
Houck, PR ;
Mulsant, BH ;
Pollock, BG ;
Mazumdar, S ;
Miller, MD ;
Dew, MA ;
Frank, E ;
Kupfer, DJ ;
Reynolds, CF .
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 2002, 69 (1-3) :177-184