C2 monitoring in maintenance renal transplant recipients:: Is it worthwhile?

被引:41
作者
Midtvedt, K [1 ]
Fauchald, P
Bergan, S
Hoieggen, A
Hallan, S
Svarstad, E
Bergrem, H
Eriksen, BO
Pfeffer, PF
Dalen, I
Leivestad, T
机构
[1] Natl Hosp Norway, Dept Med, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Hosp N Norway, Tromso, Norway
[3] Haukeland Hosp, N-5021 Bergen, Norway
[4] Stavanger Hosp, Stavanger, Norway
[5] St Olavs Hosp, Trondheim, Norway
[6] Ullevaal Univ Hosp, Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.TP.0000085046.39523.D5
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Presently, there is little knowledge regarding cyclosporine (CsA) concentration at 2 hr post-dose (C-2) monitoring in maintenance patients. This study evaluates the actual C-2 range in stable renal transplant recipients (who underwent transplantation >12 months ago). In addition, we investigated whether underexposure or overexposure to CsA (assessed by C-2) affects graft function (as measured by serum [S]-creatinine). All renal transplant recipients in Norway receiving CsA were asked to participate; 1,447 fulfilled the criteria. Valid C-2 and CsA trough concentration (CO) measurements were performed in 1,032 renal transplant recipients (71%) monitored by C-0. Target C-0 level was 75 to 125 mumol/L. CsA levels were measured using a Cloned Enzyme Donor Immunoassay method, and all analyses were performed in the same laboratory (overall mean [+/-standard deviation] CsA C-0 = 112 +/- 31 mug/L, CsA C-2 = 697 +/- 211 mug/L [range 81-1,580 mug/L], CsA dose [mg/day]= 208 +/- 61, CsA dose [mg/kg/day]= 2.8 +/- 1.1, and S-creatinine = 141 +/- 58 mumol/L). A univariate analysis of variance showed that patients with C-2 levels between 700 and 800 mug/L (n = 203, S-creatinine = 136 +/- 49 mumol/L) had significantly lower S-creatinine levels compared with patients with C-2 levels greater than 950 mug/L (n = 94, S-creatinine = 152 +/- 56 mumol/L) (P < 0.02). The same was true for patients with C-2 levels less than 450 mug/L (n = 95, S-creatinine 141 +/- 72 mumol/L) (P < 0.05) when compared with patients with C-2 levels greater than 950 mug/L. There was no significant difference in S-creatinine between patients in the low and intermediate C-2 group; 666 patients had C-0 levels in the therapeutic range (75-125 mumol/L). A linear regression showed a significant relation between S-creatinine and C2 for these patients (P = 0.03). The corresponding relation between S-creatinine and C-0 was nonsignificant (P = 0.3). Monitoring of C-2 in maintenance patients is a valuable tool to detect overexposure to CsA. Until results from prospective studies are available, we recommend C-0 in the therapeutic range and reduction in CsA in overexposed patients, aiming at a C-2 value between 700 and 800 mug/L.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1238
页数:3
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   C2 single-point sampling to evaluate cyclosporine exposure in long-term renal transplant recipients [J].
Citterio, F ;
Scatà, MC ;
Borzi, MT ;
Pozzetto, U ;
Castagneto, M .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (7-8) :3133-3136
[2]   Adequate early cyclosporin exposure is critical to prevent renal allograft rejection: Patients monitored by absorption profiling [J].
Clase, CM ;
Mahalati, K ;
Kiberd, BA ;
Lawen, JG ;
West, KA ;
Fraser, AD ;
Belitsky, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (08) :789-795
[3]   Recommendations for the implementation of Neoral C2 monitoring in clinical practice [J].
Cole, E ;
Midtvedt, K ;
Johnston, A ;
Pattison, J ;
O'Grady, C .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (09) :S19-S22
[4]  
COLE E, 2001, TRANSPLANT ODYS 0820
[5]  
KAHAN BD, 2002, CLIN THER, V24, P1
[6]  
Keown P, 2001, TRANSPLANTATION, V72, P1024
[7]   C2 monitoring strategy for optimising cyclosporin immunosuppression from the neoral®1 formulation [J].
Levy, GA .
BIODRUGS, 2001, 15 (05) :279-290
[8]   Neoral monitoring by simplified sparse sampling area under the concentration-time curve - Its relationship to acute rejection and cyclosporine nephrotoxicity early after kidney transplantation [J].
Mahalati, K ;
Belitsky, P ;
Sketris, I ;
West, K ;
Panek, R .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1999, 68 (01) :55-62
[9]  
Mahalati K, 2001, J AM SOC NEPHROL, V12, P828, DOI 10.1681/ASN.V124828
[10]  
PFEFFER P, 2002, AM SOC TRANSPL C WAS