Validation and Characterization of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Effective Orifice Area Measured by Doppler Echocardiography

被引:73
作者
Clavel, Marie-Annick [1 ]
Rodes-Cabau, Josep [1 ]
Dumont, Eric [1 ]
Bagur, Rodrigo [1 ]
Bergeron, Sebastien [1 ]
De Larochelliere, Robert [1 ]
Doyle, Daniel [1 ]
Larose, Eric [1 ]
Dumesnil, Jean G. [1 ]
Pibarot, Philippe [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Inst Univ Cardiol & Pneumol Quebec, Quebec Heart & Lung Inst, Quebec City, PQ G1V 4G5, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
aortic stenosis; echocardiography; prosthesis; transcatheter; valves; PROSTHESIS-PATIENT MISMATCH; LONG-TERM SURVIVAL; HIGH-RISK PATIENTS; LOW-FLOW; STENOSIS; IMPLANTATION; REPLACEMENT; RECOMMENDATIONS; ULTRASOUND; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1016/j.jcmg.2011.06.021
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The objectives were to compare different Doppler echocardiographic methods for the measurement of prosthetic valve effective orifice area (EOA) following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and to determine the factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter balloon expandable valves. BACKGROUND Previous studies have used different methods for the measurement of the valve EOA following TAVI. Factors influencing the EOA of transcatheter valves are unknown. METHODS A total of 122 patients underwent TAVI with the use of the Edwards-SAPIEN valve (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California). The EOA was measured by transthoracic echocardiography at hospital discharge, 6 months and 1 year after TAVI with the use of 2 methods as described in previous studies. In Method #1 (EOA(1)), LVOT diameter (LVOTd) entered in the continuity equation was measured at the base of prosthesis cusps whereas, in Method #2 (EOA(2)), LVOTd was measured immediately proximal to the prosthesis stent. RESULTS The average EOA(2) (1.57 +/- 0.41 cm(2)) was larger (p < 0.01) than the EOA(1) (1.21 +/- 0.38 cm(2)). Accordingly, incidence of severe PPM (indexed EOA <= 0.65 cm(2)/m(2)) was 3-fold lower with the use of EOA(2) than with EOA(1) (9% vs. 33%; p < 0.001). Mean transprosthetic gradient correlated better (p = 0.03) with indexed EOA(2) (r = -0.70, p < 0.0001) than with indexed EOA(1) (r = -0.58, p < 0.0001). Intraobserver and interobserver variability were lower for EOA(2) compared to EOA(1) (intra: 5% vs. 7%, p = 0.06; inter: 6% vs. 14%; p < 0.001). Aortic annulus size was the sole independent determinant (p = 0.01) of prosthetic valve EOA(2). The average EOA varied from 1.37 +/- 0.23 cm(2) for aortic annulus size <19 mm up to 1.90 +/- 0.17 cm(2) for size >23 mm. CONCLUSIONS When estimating the EOA of Edwards-SAPIEN valves by Doppler-echocardiography, it is recommended to use the LVOT diameter and velocity measured immediately proximal to the stent. The main determinant of the EOA of transcatheter valves is the patient's annulus size and these valves provide excellent hemodynamics even in patients with a small aortic annulus. (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2011;4:1053-62) (C) 2011 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation
引用
收藏
页码:1053 / 1062
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Echocardiographic Assessment of Valve Stenosis: EAE/ASE Recommendations for Clinical Practice
    Baumgartner, Helmut
    Hung, Judy
    Bermejo, Javier
    Chambers, John B.
    Evangelista, Arturo
    Griffin, Brian P.
    Iung, Bernard
    Otto, Catherine M.
    Pellikka, Patricia A.
    Quinones, Miguel
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2009, 22 (01) : 1 - 23
  • [2] Bednarz J E, 1996, J Am Soc Echocardiogr, V9, P286, DOI 10.1016/S0894-7317(96)90142-X
  • [3] STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
    BLAND, JM
    ALTMAN, DG
    [J]. LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) : 307 - 310
  • [4] Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: from evaluation to treatment
    Burwash, Ian G.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN CARDIOLOGY, 2007, 22 (02) : 84 - 91
  • [5] Comparison of the Hemodynamic Performance of Percutaneous and Surgical Bioprostheses for the Treatment of Severe Aortic Stenosis
    Clavel, Marie-Annick
    Webb, John G.
    Pibarot, Philippe
    Altwegg, Lukas
    Dumont, Eric
    Thompson, Chris
    De Larochelliere, Robert
    Doyle, Daniel
    Masson, Jean-Bernard
    Bergeron, Sebastien
    Bertrand, Olivier F.
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 53 (20) : 1883 - 1891
  • [6] Assessment of aortic valve stenosis severity - A new index based on the energy loss concept
    Garcia, D
    Pibarot, P
    Dumesnil, JG
    Sakr, F
    Durand, LG
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2000, 101 (07) : 765 - 771
  • [7] Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation Durability of Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes Beyond 3 Years in a Large Patient Cohort
    Gurvitch, R.
    Wood, D. A.
    Tay, E. L.
    Leipsic, J.
    Ye, J.
    Lichtenstein, S. V.
    Thompson, C. R.
    Carere, R. G.
    Wijesinghe, N.
    Nietlispach, F.
    Boone, R. H.
    Lauck, S.
    Cheung, A.
    Webb, J. G.
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2010, 122 (13) : 1319 - 1327
  • [8] Paradoxical low-flow, low-gradient severe aortic stenosis despite preserved ejection fraction is associated with higher afterload and reduced survival
    Hachicha, Zeineb
    Dumesnil, Jean G.
    Bogaty, Peter
    Pibarot, Philippe
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (22) : 2856 - 2864
  • [9] Results of Transfemoral or Transapical Aortic Valve Implantation Following a Uniform Assessment in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis
    Himbert, Dominique
    Descoutures, Fleur
    Al-Attar, Nawwar
    Iung, Bernard
    Ducrocq, Gregory
    Detaint, Delphine
    Brochet, Eric
    Messika-Zeitoun, David
    Francis, Fady
    Ibrahim, Hassan
    Nataf, Patrick
    Vahanian, Alec
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (04) : 303 - 311
  • [10] Prosthesis-patient mismatch after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Medtronic-Corevalve bioprosthesis
    Jilaihawi, Hasan
    Chin, Derek
    Spyt, Tomasz
    Jeilan, Mohamed
    Vasa-Nicotera, Mariuca
    Bence, Johan
    Logtens, Elaine
    Kovac, Jan
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2010, 31 (07) : 857 - 864