Just teasing: A conceptual analysis and empirical review

被引:278
作者
Keltner, D [1 ]
Capps, L [1 ]
Kring, AM [1 ]
Young, RC [1 ]
Heerey, EA [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Psychol, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1037//0033-2909.127.2.229
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Drawing on E. Goffman's concepts of face and strategic interaction, the authors define a tease as a playful provocation in which one person comments on something relevant to the target. This approach encompasses the diverse behaviors labeled teasing, clarifies previous ambiguities, differentiates teasing from related practices, and suggests how teasing can lead to hostile or affiliative outcomes. The authors then integrate studies of the content of teasing. Studies indicate that norm violations and conflict prompt teasing. With development, children tease in playful ways, particularly around the ages of 11 and 12 years, and understand and enjoy teasing more. Finally, consistent with hypotheses concerning contextual variation in face concerns, teasing is more frequent and hostile when initiated by high-status and familiar others and men, although gender differences are smaller than assumed. The authors conclude by discussing how teasing varies according to individual differences and culture.
引用
收藏
页码:229 / 248
页数:20
相关论文
共 140 条
[1]   PLAYING THE DOZENS [J].
ABRAHAMS, RD .
JOURNAL OF AMERICAN FOLKLORE, 1962, 75 (297) :209-220
[2]   FORM AND FUNCTION IN CHILDRENS UNDERSTANDING OF IRONIC UTTERANCES [J].
ACKERMAN, BP .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 35 (03) :487-508
[3]  
Alberts J.K., 1992, J LANG SOC PSYCHOL, V11, P153, DOI [DOI 10.1177/0261927X92113003, https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X92113003]
[4]  
[Anonymous], SOCIOLOGICAL STUDIES
[5]  
[Anonymous], RAPPIN STYLIN OUT CO
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1996, INTERACTION GRAMMAR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1987, POLITENESS
[8]  
Apte MahadevL., 1985, HUMOR LAUGHTER ANTHR
[9]  
Aries E., 1996, MEN WOMEN INTERACTIO
[10]   AN INVESTIGATION OF COMPLIANCE-GAINING AS POLITENESS [J].
BAXTER, LA .
HUMAN COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 1984, 10 (03) :427-456