Prediction of endometrial carcinoma by subjective endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia diagnosis

被引:86
作者
Hecht, JL
Ince, TA
Baak, JPA
Baker, HE
Ogden, MW
Mutter, GL
机构
[1] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Dept Pathol, Div Womens & Perinatal Pathol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Beth Israel Hosp, Dept Pathol, Boston, MA USA
[3] Cent Hosp Rogaland, Dept Pathol, Stavanger, Norway
关键词
EIN; endometrial hyperplasia; histomorphometry; precancer; pathology; prognosis;
D O I
10.1038/modpathol.3800328
中图分类号
R36 [病理学];
学科分类号
100104 ;
摘要
Endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia ( also known as ' EIN') is a precursor to endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma characterized by monoclonal growth of mutated cells, a distinctive histopathologic appearance, and 45- fold elevated cancer risk. We have applied diagnostic criteria for EIN to 97 successive endometrial biopsies classified as hyperplastic according to World Health Organization criteria and correlated results with computer- assisted morphometry ( D- score) and clinical cancer outcomes. Three pathologists separately reviewed all cases for presence or absence of EIN using published criteria ( gland area > stromal area, cytologic change in focus of altered architecture, lesion size > 1 mm, and exclusion of cancer and mimics). Discordant cases were resolved by a consensus review at a multiheaded scope. Clinical outcomes were obtained in 84 patients from patient visit and pathology records. Diagnoses of presence or absence of EIN were unanimous among all three pathologists in 75% of cases, and intraobserver- reproducibility was very good ( kappa 0.73 - 0.90). Cases rediagnosed as EIN encompassed hyperplasias previously diagnosed as atypical ( n = 18) or nonatypical ( eight complex, two simple). Eight follow- up cancers were scattered between hyperplasia types ( 5/ 21 atypical, 3/ 63 nonatypical), but all classified as EIN ( 8/ 25) and D- score less than or equal to 1 ( 8/ 38). Subjective application of criteria for diagnosis of EIN correlates well with objective morphometry and successfully segregates patients into high and low cancer risk subgroups with better reproducibility than atypical hyperplasia diagnosis.
引用
收藏
页码:324 / 330
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, BLAUSTEINS PATHOLOGY
[2]  
BAAK JPA, 1982, PATHOL ANNU, V17, P287
[3]   ARCHITECTURAL AND NUCLEAR MORPHOMETRICAL FEATURES TOGETHER ARE MORE IMPORTANT PROGNOSTICATORS IN ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIAS THAN NUCLEAR MORPHOMETRICAL FEATURES ALONE [J].
BAAK, JPA ;
NAUTA, JJP ;
WISSEBREKELMANS, ECM ;
BEZEMER, PD .
JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY, 1988, 154 (04) :335-341
[4]   ASSESSMENT OF THE RISK ON ENDOMETRIAL CANCER IN HYPERPLASIA, BY MEANS OF MORPHOLOGICAL AND MORPHOMETRICAL FEATURES [J].
BAAK, JPA ;
WISSEBREKELMANS, ECM ;
FLEEGE, JC ;
VANDERPUTTEN, HWHM ;
BEZEMER, PD .
PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 1992, 188 (07) :856-859
[5]   Prospective multicenter evaluation of the morphometric D-score for prediction of the outcome of endometrial hyperplasias [J].
Baak, JPA ;
Orbo, A ;
van Diest, PJ ;
Jiwa, M ;
de Bruin, P ;
Broeckaert, M ;
Snijders, W ;
Boodt, PJ ;
Fons, G ;
Burger, C ;
Verheijen, RHM ;
Houben, PWH ;
The, HS ;
Kenemans, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2001, 25 (07) :930-935
[6]   QUANTITATIVE, MICROSCOPICAL, COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS OF ENDOMETRIAL HYPERPLASIA OR CARCINOMA IN INDIVIDUAL PATIENTS [J].
BAAK, JPA ;
KURVER, PHJ ;
OVERDIEP, SH ;
DELEMARRE, JFM ;
BOON, ME ;
LINDEMAN, J ;
DIEGENBACH, PC .
HISTOPATHOLOGY, 1981, 5 (06) :689-695
[7]   A multicentric European study testing the reproducibility of the WHO classification of endometrial hyperplasia with a proposal of a simplified working classification for biopsy and curettage specimens [J].
Bergeron, C ;
Nogales, FF ;
Masseroli, M ;
Abeler, V ;
Duvillard, P ;
Müller-Holzner, E ;
Pickartz, H ;
Wells, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1999, 23 (09) :1102-1108
[8]   2 PATHOGENETIC TYPES OF ENDOMETRIAL CARCINOMA [J].
BOKHMAN, JV .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1983, 15 (01) :10-17
[9]   Use of computerized morphometric analyses of endometrial hyperplasias in the prediction of coexistent cancer [J].
Dunton, CJ ;
Baak, JPA ;
Palazzo, JP ;
vanDiest, PJ ;
McHugh, M ;
Widra, EA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 174 (05) :1518-1521
[10]   Reproducibility of the diagnosis of endometrial hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and well-differentiated carcinoma [J].
Kendall, BS ;
Ronnett, BM ;
Isacson, C ;
Cho, KR ;
Hedrick, L ;
Diener-West, M ;
Kurman, RJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1998, 22 (08) :1012-1019