Palonosetron improves prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a double-blind randomized phase III trial comparing single doses of palonosetron with ondansetron

被引:334
作者
Gralla, R
Lichinitser, M
Van der Vegt, S
Sleeboom, H
Mezger, J
Peschel, C
Tonini, G
Labianca, R
Macciocchi, A
Aapro, M
机构
[1] Clin Genolier, IMO, CH-1272 Genolier, Vaud, Switzerland
[2] New York Lung Canc Alliance, New York, NY USA
[3] Russian Acad Med Sci, Canc Res Ctr, Moscow, Russia
[4] Ziekenhuis Ondenrijn, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Ziekenhuis Leyenburg, The Hague, Netherlands
[6] St Vincentius Kliniken, Karlsruhe, Germany
[7] Tech Univ Munich, Klinikum Rechts Isar, D-8000 Munich, Germany
[8] Biomed Univ, Dept Oncol, Rome, Italy
[9] Osped Riuniti Bergamo, Unita Operat Oncol Med, I-24100 Bergamo, Italy
[10] Helsinn Healthcare SA, Lugano, Switzerland
关键词
chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting; emesis; 5-HT3 receptor antagonist; ondansetron; palonosetron;
D O I
10.1093/annonc/mdg417
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Although all first-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonists demonstrate efficacy in preventing acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), effective prevention of delayed CINV has not yet been achieved. This study compared the efficacy and tolerability of palonosetron, a novel, second-generation 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, with ondansetron. Patients and methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, stratified, phase III study, 570 adult cancer patients were randomized to receive a single i.v. dose of palonosetron 0.25 mg, palonosetron 0.75 mg or ondansetron 32 mg, each administered 30 min before initiation of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. The primary end point was the proportion of patients with no emetic episodes and no rescue medication [complete response (CR)] during the 24 h after chemotherapy administration (acute period). Secondary end points included efficacy in treatment of delayed CINV (less than or equal to5 days post-chemotherapy) and overall tolerability. Results: 563 patients were evaluable for efficacy. CR rates were significantly higher (P <0.01) for palonosetron 0.25 mg than ondansetron during the acute (0-24 h) (81.0% versus 68.6%. respectively), delayed (24-120 h) (74.1 % versus 55.1 %) and overall (0-120 h) (69.3% versus 50.3%) periods. CR rates achieved with palonosetron 0.75 mg were numerically higher but not statistically different from ondansetron during all three time intervals. Both treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: A single i.v. dose of palonosetron 0.25 mg was significantly superior to i.v. ondansetron 32 mg in the prevention of acute and delayed CINV.
引用
收藏
页码:1570 / 1577
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   A randomized double-blind trial to compare the clinical efficacy of granisetron with metoclopramide, both combined with dexamethasone in the prophylaxis of chemotherapy-induced delayed emesis [J].
Aapro, MS ;
Thuerlimann, B ;
Sessa, C ;
de Pree, C ;
Bernhard, J ;
Maibach, R .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (02) :291-297
[2]  
[Anonymous], ANZ DOL MES INJ PRES
[3]  
[Anonymous], P AM SOC CLIN ONCOL
[4]  
Audhuy B, 1996, EUR J CANCER, V32A, P807
[5]   Dimensions of quality of life expressed by men treated for metastatic prostate cancer [J].
Clark, JA ;
Wray, N ;
Brody, B ;
Ashton, C ;
Giesler, B ;
Watkins, H .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 1997, 45 (08) :1299-1309
[6]   Granisetron, tropisetron, and ondansetron in the prevention of acute emesis induced by a combination of cisplatin-Adriamycin and by high-dose ifosfamide delivered in multiple-day continuous infusions [J].
Forni, C ;
Ferrari, S ;
Loro, L ;
Mazzei, T ;
Beghelli, C ;
Biolchini, A ;
Simoni, P ;
Tremosini, M ;
Strazzari, S ;
Puggioli, C ;
Bacci, G .
SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2000, 8 (02) :131-133
[7]  
GEBBIA V, 1994, CANCER, V74, P1945, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19941001)74:7<1945::AID-CNCR2820740720>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-C
[9]  
*GLAX, 2001, ZOFR OND HYDR INJ PR
[10]   Recommendations for the use of antiemetics: Evidence-based, clinical practice guidelines [J].
Gralla, RJ ;
Osoba, D ;
Kris, MG ;
Kirkbride, P ;
Hesketh, PJ ;
Chinnery, LW ;
Clark-Snow, R ;
Gill, DP ;
Groshen, S ;
Grunberg, S ;
Koeller, JM ;
Morrow, GR ;
Perez, EA ;
Silber, JH ;
Pfister, DG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (09) :2971-2994