Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections - Results of a double-blind, randomized comparative phase III trial

被引:142
作者
Solomkin, JS
Yellin, AE
Rotstein, OD
Christou, NV
Dellinger, EP
Tellado, JM
Malafaia, O
Fernandez, A
Choe, KA
Carides, A
Satishchandran, V
Teppler, H
机构
[1] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Surg, Cincinnati, OH 45267 USA
[2] Univ So Calif, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Surg, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Div Gen Surg, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[5] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Div Gen Surg, Seattle, WA USA
[6] Hosp Gregorio Maranon, Madrid, Spain
[7] Hosp Univ Evangelico, Prinicpious Circugria, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil
[8] Edificio Ctr Med 2, Guatemala City, Guatemala
[9] Merck Res Labs, Clin Res Infect Dis, W Point, PA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000658-200302000-00013
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective. To examine the clinical efficacy and safety of ertapenem, a novel beta-lactam agent with wide activity against common pathogens encountered in intraabdominal infection. Summary Background Data Ertapenem has a pharmacokinetic profile and antimicrobial spectrum that support the potential for use as a once-a-day agent for the treatment of common mixed aerobic and anaerobic infections. Methods. This prospective, randomized, controlled, and double-blind trial was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy of ertapenem with piperacillin/tazobactam as therapy following adequate surgical management of complicated intraabdominal infections. Results. Six hundred thirty-three patients were included in the modified intent-to-treat population, with 396 meeting all criteria for the evaluable population. Patients with a wide range of infections were enrolled; perforated or abscessed appendicitis was most common (approximately 60% in microbiologically evaluable population). A prospective, expert panel review was conducted to assess the adequacy of surgical source control in patients who were failures as a component of evaluability. For the modified intent-to-treat groups, 245 of 311 patients treated with ertapenem (79.3%) were cured, as were 232 of 304 (76.2) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. One hundred seventy-six of 203 microbiologically evaluable patients treated with ertapenem (86.7%) were cured, as were 157 of the 193 (81.2%) treated with piperacillin/tazobactam. Conclusions. In this study, the efficacy of ertapenem 1 g once a day was equivalent to piperacillin/tazobactam 3.375 g every 6 hours in the treatment of a range of intraabdominal infections. Ertapenem was generally well tolerated and had a similar safety and tolerability profile to piperacillin/tazobactam. A formal process for review of adequacy of source control was found to be of benefit. The results of this trial suggest that ertapenem may be a useful option that could eliminate the need for combination and/or multidosed antibiotic regimens for the empiric treatment of intraabdominal infections.
引用
收藏
页码:235 / 245
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BARTLETT JG, 1978, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V113, P853
[2]  
BEAM TR, 1992, CLIN INFECT DIS S1, V15, P5
[3]   ANTIBIOTIC MANAGEMENT OF SURGICALLY TREATED GANGRENOUS OR PERFORATED APPENDICITIS - COMPARISON OF GENTAMICIN AND CLINDAMYCIN VERSUS CEFAMANDOLE VERSUS CEFOPERAZONE [J].
BERNE, TV ;
YELLIN, AW ;
APPLEMAN, MD ;
HESELTINE, PNR .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1982, 144 (01) :8-13
[4]  
Bohnen JMA, 1999, CAN J SURG, V42, P122
[5]   DEFINITION OF THE ROLE OF ENTEROCOCCUS IN INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTION - ANALYSIS OF A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED TRIAL [J].
BURNETT, RJ ;
HAVERSTOCK, DC ;
DELLINGER, EP ;
REINHART, HH ;
BOHNEN, JM ;
ROTSTEIN, OD ;
VOGEL, SB ;
SOLOMKIN, JS .
SURGERY, 1995, 118 (04) :716-723
[6]  
DEVENEY CW, 1988, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V123, P1126
[7]   In vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against clinical bacterial isolates from 11 North American medical centers [J].
Fuchs, PC ;
Barry, AL ;
Brown, SD .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2001, 45 (06) :1915-1918
[8]   In vivo activity and pharmacokinetic evaluation of a novel long-acting carbapenem antibiotic, MK-826 (L-749,345) [J].
Gill, CJ ;
Jackson, JJ ;
Gerckens, LS ;
Pelak, BA ;
Thompson, RK ;
Sundelof, JG ;
Kropp, H ;
Rosen, H .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1998, 42 (08) :1996-2001
[9]   MATCHED CASE-CONTROL STUDY OF ADJUSTED VERSUS NONADJUSTED GENTAMICIN DOSING IN PERFORATED AND GANGRENOUS APPENDICITIS [J].
GILL, MA ;
CHEETHAM, TC ;
CHENELLA, FC ;
HESELTINE, PNR ;
YELLIN, AE ;
APPLEMAN, MD ;
BERNE, TV .
THERAPEUTIC DRUG MONITORING, 1986, 8 (04) :451-456
[10]   Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against 1,001 anaerobes isolated from human intra-abdominal infections [J].
Goldstein, EJC ;
Citron, DM ;
Merriam, CV ;
Warren, Y ;
Tyrrell, KL .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2000, 44 (09) :2389-2394