Limiting factors and landscape connectivity: the American marten in the Rocky Mountains

被引:66
作者
Cushman, S. A. [1 ]
Raphael, M. G. [2 ]
Ruggiero, L. F. [3 ]
Shirk, A. S. [4 ]
Wasserman, T. N. [5 ]
O'Doherty, E. C. [6 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA
[2] US Forest Serv, Pacific NW Res Stn, Olympia, WA 98512 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Missoula, MT 59801 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Climate Impacts Grp, Olympia, WA 98512 USA
[5] No Arizona Univ, Flagstaff, AZ 86001 USA
[6] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, Laramie, WY USA
关键词
American marten; Martes americana; Path-selection; Fragmentation; Limiting-factors; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; FOREST; SELECTION; THRESHOLDS; EXTINCTION; MOVEMENTS; ABUNDANCE; PATTERN;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-011-9645-8
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
In mobile animals, movement behavior can maximize fitness by optimizing access to critical resources and minimizing risk of predation. We sought to evaluate several hypotheses regarding the effects of landscape structure on American marten foraging path selection in a landscape experiencing forest perforation by patchcut logging. We hypothesized that in the uncut pre-treatment landscape marten would choose foraging paths to maximize access to cover types that support the highest density of prey. In contrast, in the post-treatment landscapes we hypothesized marten would choose paths primarily to avoid crossing openings, and that this would limit their ability to optimally select paths to maximize foraging success. Our limiting factor analysis shows that different resistant models may be supported under changing landscape conditions due to threshold effects, even when a species' response to landscape variables is constant. Our results support previous work showing forest harvest strongly affects marten movement behavior. The most important result of our study, however, is that the influence of these features changes dramatically depending on the degree to which timber harvest limits available movement paths. Marten choose foraging paths in uncut landscapes to maximize time spent in cover types providing the highest density of prey species. In contrast, following landscape perforation by patchcuts, marten strongly select paths to avoid crossing unforested areas. This strong response to patch cutting reduces their ability to optimize foraging paths to vegetation type. Marten likely avoid non-forested areas in fragmented landscapes to reduce risk of predation and to benefit thermoregulation in winter, but in doing so they may suffer a secondary cost of decreased foraging efficiency.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1149
页数:13
相关论文
共 56 条
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2009, ARCGIS
  • [3] Assessing habitat selection when availability changes
    Arthur, SM
    Manly, BFJ
    McDonald, LL
    Garner, GW
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 1996, 77 (01) : 215 - 227
  • [4] Habitat fragmentation, percolation theory and the conservation of a keystone species
    Boswell, GP
    Britton, NF
    Franks, NR
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1998, 265 (1409) : 1921 - 1925
  • [5] Covariates affecting spatial variability in bison travel behavior in Yellowstone National Park
    Bruggeman, Jason E.
    Garrott, Robert A.
    White, P. J.
    Watson, Fred G. R.
    Wallen, Rick
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2007, 17 (05) : 1411 - 1423
  • [6] Why replication is important in landscape genetics: American black bear in the Rocky Mountains
    Bull, R. A. Short
    Cushman, S. A.
    Mace, R.
    Chilton, T.
    Kendall, K. C.
    Landguth, E. L.
    Schwartz, M. K.
    McKelvey, K.
    Allendorf, Fred W.
    Luikart, G.
    [J]. MOLECULAR ECOLOGY, 2011, 20 (06) : 1092 - 1107
  • [7] Extinction in fragmented habitats predicted from stochastic birth-death processes with density dependence
    Burkey, TV
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THEORETICAL BIOLOGY, 1999, 199 (04) : 395 - 406
  • [8] Buskirk Steven W., 1994, P283
  • [9] Influence of landscape pattern on habitat use by American marten in an industrial forest
    Chapin, TG
    Harrison, DJ
    Katnik, DD
    [J]. CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1998, 12 (06) : 1327 - 1337
  • [10] Collingham YC, 2000, ECOL APPL, V10, P131, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[0131:IOHFAP]2.0.CO