CT Colonography of colorectal polyps: A metaanalysis

被引:115
作者
Sosna, J
Morrin, MM
Kruskal, JB
Lavin, PT
Rosen, MP
Raptopoulos, V
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Boston Biostat Res Fdn, Framingham, MA 01701 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.181.6.1811593
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. For proper evaluation of the accuracy of CT colonography, prospective multiinstitutional trials would be ideal. Until these trials are available, data can be collectively analyzed. The purpose of this study is to use metaanalysis to assess the reported accuracy of CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy for detecting colorectal polyps. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Articles comparing CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy were identified, and a standardized form was used to extract relevant study data. Fisher's exact test and the Mantel-Haenszel test were used for pooling of data. A 95% confidence interval (CI) was selected to determine sensitivity and specificity, and the Kruskal-Wallis exact test was used to identify trends relating to polyp size. Meta-analysis methods were used to test strength of results. Comparisons were made for the percentage of polyps detected grouped by size (greater than or equal to 10 mm, 6-9 mm,less than or equal to 5 mm) and the percentage of patients identified who had polyps of the same size. RESULTS. Fourteen studies fulfilled all the study inclusion criteria and gave a total of 1,324 patients and 1,411 polyps. The pooled per-patient sensitivity for polyps 10 mm or larger was (sensitivity [95% CI]) 0.88 (0.84-0.93), for polyps 6-9 mm it was 0.84 (0.80-0.89), and for polyps 5 turn or smaller it was 0.65 (0.57-0.73). The pooled per-polyp sensitivity for polyps 10 mm or larger was 0.81 (0.76-0.85), for polyps 6-9 mm it was 0.62 (0.58-0.67), and for polyps 5 mm or smaller it was 0.43 (0.39-0.47). Sensitivity for detection of polyps increased as the polyp size increased (p < 0.00005). The pooled overall specificity for detection of polyps larger than 10 mm was 0.95 (0.94-0.97). CONCLUSION. The specificity and sensitivity of CT colonography are high for polyps larger than 10 mm.
引用
收藏
页码:1593 / 1598
页数:6
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   ASSESSMENT OF RADIOLOGIC TESTS - CONTROL OF BIAS AND OTHER DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1988, 167 (02) :565-569
[2]   CT colonography: Value of scanning in both the supine and prone positions [J].
Chen, SC ;
Lu, DSK ;
Hecht, JR ;
Kadell, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1999, 172 (03) :595-599
[3]  
Cooper H., 1994, HDB RES SYNTHESIS, V1st
[4]   Diagnostic performance of virtual colonoscopy [J].
Dachman, AH .
ABDOMINAL IMAGING, 2002, 27 (03) :260-267
[5]   CT colonography with three-dimensional problem solving for detection of colonic polyps [J].
Dachman, AH ;
Kuniyoshi, JK ;
Boyle, CM ;
Samara, Y ;
Hoffmann, KR ;
Rubin, DT ;
Hanan, I .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1998, 171 (04) :989-995
[6]   Colorectal neoplasm detection using virtual colonoscopy: a feasibility study [J].
Fenlon, HM ;
Nunes, DP ;
Clarke, PD ;
Ferrucci, JT .
GUT, 1998, 43 (06) :806-811
[7]   A comparison of virtual and conventional colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps [J].
Fenlon, HM ;
Nunes, DP ;
Schroy, PC ;
Barish, MA ;
Clarke, PD ;
Ferrucci, JT .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1999, 341 (20) :1496-1503
[8]   Opinion - CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening: Lessons from mammography [J].
Ferrucci, JT .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2000, 174 (06) :1539-1541
[9]   Optimization of CT colonography technique: Prospective trial in 180 patients [J].
Fletcher, JG ;
Johnson, CD ;
Welch, TJ ;
MacCarty, RL ;
Ahlquist, DA ;
Reed, JE ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Wilson, LA .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 216 (03) :704-711
[10]   Performance of multidetector computed tomography colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy [J].
Gluecker, T ;
Dorta, G ;
Keller, W ;
Jornod, P ;
Meuli, R ;
Schnyder, P .
GUT, 2002, 51 (02) :207-211