DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units

被引:123
作者
Sinuany-Stern, Z [1 ]
Friedman, L [1 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Ind Engn & Management, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
关键词
data envelopment analysis; discriminant analysis; ranking; scaling; multicriteria decision analysis;
D O I
10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00313-5
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to develop a new method which provides for given inputs and outputs the best common weights for all the units that discriminate optimally between the efficient and inefficient units as pregiven by the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), in order to rank all the units on the same scale. This new method, Discriminant Data Envelopment Analysis of Ratios (DR/DEA), presents a further post-optimality analysis of DEA for organizational units when their multiple inputs and outputs are given. We construct the ratio between the composite output and the composite input, where their common weights are computed by a new non-linear optimization of goodness of separation between the two pregiven groups. A practical use of DR/DEA is that the common weights may be utilized for ranking the units on a unified scale. DR/DEA is a new use of a two-group discriminant criterion that has been presented here for ratios, rather than the traditional discriminant analysis which applies to a linear function. Moreover, nonparametric statistical tests are employed to verify the consistency between the classification from DEA (efficient and inefficient units) and the post-classification as generated by DR/DEA. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 478
页数:9
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A PROCEDURE FOR RANKING EFFICIENT UNITS IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
ANDERSEN, P ;
PETERSEN, NC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1261-1265
[2]   New uses of DEA and statistical regressions for efficiency evaluation and estimation - With an illustrative application to public secondary schools in Texas [J].
Arnold, VL ;
Bardhan, IR ;
Cooper, WW ;
Kumbhakar, SC .
ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1996, 66 :255-277
[3]   MAXIMUM-LIKELIHOOD, CONSISTENCY AND DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS - A STATISTICAL FOUNDATION [J].
BANKER, RD .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1993, 39 (10) :1265-1273
[4]   Using rank statistics for determining programmatic efficiency differences in Data Envelopment Analysis [J].
Brockett, PL ;
Golany, B .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1996, 42 (03) :466-472
[5]   THE NON-ARCHIMEDEAN CCR RATIO FOR EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS - A REJOINDER [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1984, 15 (03) :333-334
[6]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[7]  
COOK WD, 1990, INFOR, V28, P113
[8]   A DATA ENVELOPMENT MODEL FOR AGGREGATING PREFERENCE RANKINGS [J].
COOK, WD ;
KRESS, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1990, 36 (11) :1302-1310
[9]   A MULTIPLE CRITERIA DECISION-MODEL WITH ORDINAL PREFERENCE DATA [J].
COOK, WD ;
KRESS, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1991, 54 (02) :191-198
[10]   PRIORITIZATION MODELS FOR FRONTIER DECISION-MAKING UNITS IN DEA [J].
COOK, WD ;
KRESS, M ;
SEIFORD, LM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1992, 59 (02) :319-323