Effect of body mass index and excessive weight gain on success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery

被引:80
作者
Juhasz, G
Gyamfi, C
Gyamfi, P
Tocce, K
Stone, JL
机构
[1] Columbia Univ Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, New York, NY 10032 USA
[2] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Dept Obstet Gynecol & Reprod Sci, New York, NY USA
[3] ORC Macro, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Univ Debrecen, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Med & Hlth Sci Ctr, H-4012 Debrecen, Hungary
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000177972.32941.65
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether excessive weight gain or obesity are risk factors affecting success for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC). METHODS: Patients attempting VBAC were identified by the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes "VBAC" and "non-primary C-section" and by reviewing logbooks on labor and delivery. A chart review identified patients attempting VBAC who were eligible for inclusion. Exclusion criteria included multiple gestation, more than one previous cesarean delivery, previous classical uterine scar, delivery at less than 36 weeks of gestation, and incomplete information. Patients were divided into the following categories: underweight (body mass index [BMI] < 19.8), normal weight (BMI 19.8-26), overweight (BMI 26.1-29), and obese (BMI > 29). Excessive weight gain was defined as a weight gain of, more than 40 lb. Variables of interest included diabetes, previous successful vaginal delivery or VBAC, and presence of recurrent indication for cesarean delivery. RESULTS: We identified 1,213 patients who met inclusion criteria. Overall, the VBAC success rate was 77.2%. The success rates for BMI less than 19.8, 19.8-26, 26.1-29, and greater than 29 were 83.1%, 79.9%, 69.3%, and 68.2%, respectively, P < .001. Obese patients were almost 50% less likely to have a successful VBAC when compared to underweight patients, odds ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.29-0.98, P = .043. Similarly, patients who gained more than 40 lb were almost 40% less likely to be successful at VBAC than those who gained less than that amount, odds ratio 0.63, 95% confidence interval 0.42-0.97, P = .034. They had a VBAC success rate of 66.8%, whereas patients who gained less than 40 lb were successful 79.1% of the time, P < .001. CONCLUSION: Excessive weight gain during pregnancy and obesity both decrease VBAC success. Proper patient selection will help increase the likelihood of successful VBAC.
引用
收藏
页码:741 / 746
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean delivery: Weight-based outcomes [J].
Carroll, CS ;
Magann, EF ;
Chauhan, SP ;
Klauser, CK ;
Morrison, JC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 188 (06) :1516-1520
[2]  
*CDCP, 2005, OV OB DEF OV OB
[3]   Maternal morbid obesity and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcome [J].
Cedergren, MI .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 103 (02) :219-224
[4]   Mode of delivery for the morbidly obese with prior cesarean delivery: Vaginal versus repeat cesarean section [J].
Chauhan, SP ;
Magann, EF ;
Carroll, CS ;
Barrilleaux, PS ;
Scardo, JA ;
Martin, JN .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2001, 185 (02) :349-353
[5]   The impact of maternal obesity and weight gain on vaginal birth after cesarean section success [J].
Durnwald, CP ;
Ehrenberg, HM ;
Mercer, BM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 191 (03) :954-957
[6]   Deciding on route of delivery for obese women with a prior cesarean delivery [J].
Edwards, RK ;
Harnsberger, DS ;
Johnson, IM ;
Treloar, RW ;
Cruz, AC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (02) :385-389
[7]   ELECTIVE REPEAT CESAREAN DELIVERY VERSUS TRIAL OF LABOR - A PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER STUDY [J].
FLAMM, BL ;
GOINGS, JR ;
LIU, YB ;
WOLDETSADIK, G .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1994, 83 (06) :927-932
[8]  
Institute of Medicine, 1992, NUTR DUR PREGN LACT
[9]   Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery [J].
Landon, MB ;
Hauth, JC ;
Leveno, KJ ;
Spong, CY ;
Leindecker, S ;
Varner, MW ;
Moawad, AH ;
Caritis, SN ;
Harper, M ;
Wapner, RJ ;
Sorokin, Y ;
Miodovnik, M ;
Carpenter, M ;
Peaceman, AM ;
O'Sullivan, MJ ;
Sibai, B ;
Langer, O ;
Thorp, JM ;
Ramin, SM ;
Mercer, BM ;
Gabbe, SG ;
Iams, J ;
Johnson, F ;
Meadows, S ;
Walker, H ;
Rouse, D ;
Northen, A ;
Tate, S ;
Bloom, S ;
McCampbell, J ;
Bradford, D ;
Belfort, M ;
Porter, F ;
Oshiro, B ;
Anderson, K ;
Guzman, A ;
Hibbard, J ;
Jones, P ;
Ramos-Brinson, M ;
Moran, M ;
Scott, D ;
Lain, K ;
Cotroneo, M ;
Fischer, D ;
Luce, M ;
Meis, P ;
Swain, M ;
Moorefield, C ;
Lanier, K ;
Steele, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (25) :2581-2589
[10]   Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. [J].
Lydon-Rochelle, M ;
Holt, VL ;
Easterling, TR ;
Martin, DP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 345 (01) :3-8