Yield, flowering, and leaf area index of okra-leaf and normal-leaf cotton isolines

被引:17
作者
Heitholt, JJ [1 ]
Meredith, WR [1 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Stoneville, MS 38776 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2135/cropsci1998.0011183X003800030003x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) with alternative leaf morphologies, such as the cleft-shaped okra-leaf types, offers production advantages such as earlier maturity. However, okra-leaf types have not been commercially viable in the USA. The objectives of this study were to test okra-leaf types in genetic backgrounds varying in maturity and region of adaptation and to provide growth data that might explain yield differences, Four to seven pairs of selected cotton okra- and normal-leaf isolines (and check cultivars) were grown in the field in one 2-yr (Exp, A) and two l-yr experiments (Exp, B and C) from 1994 to 1996 near Stoneville, MS, in row spacings of 76 and 102 cm. In Exp. A, average lint yields of okra-leaf isolines were greater overall than normal-leaf lines (847 vs. 749 kg ha(-1)), but in Exp. C, the opposite was true (1020 kg ha(-1) for okra- vs. 1130 kg ha(-1) for normal-leaf types). No yield difference was found between leaf types in Exp. B, Yields of okra-leaf lines were either equal to or less than those of recently released high-yielding commercial types whose okra-leaf isolines are not yet available. Okra-leaf types were usually 1 to 4 d earlier in maturity than their normal-leaf counterparts, possibly contributing to their overall yield advantage in Exp, A. When only okra-leaf isolines were considered, Tamcot HQ95 ranked first or second highest for yield and was the earliest to mature in all three tests. In general, the row-spacing effect and interactions with row spacing were not significant. The results indicate that the okra-leaf trait should be considered for producing future cultivars.
引用
收藏
页码:643 / 648
页数:6
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   EFFECTS OF OKRA LEAF SHAPE ON BOLL ROT, YIELD, AND OTHER IMPORTANT CHARACTERS OF UPLAND COTTON, GOSSYPIUM-HIRSUTUM L [J].
ANDRIES, JA ;
JONES, JE ;
SLOANE, LW ;
MARSHALL, JG .
CROP SCIENCE, 1969, 9 (06) :705-&
[2]   REGISTRATION OF DES 119 COTTON [J].
BRIDGE, RR .
CROP SCIENCE, 1986, 26 (03) :646-647
[3]  
daSilva FP, 1996, BRAZ J GENET, V19, P453
[4]   REGISTRATION OF TAMCOT HQ95 COTTON [J].
ELZIK, KM ;
THAXTON, PM .
CROP SCIENCE, 1990, 30 (06) :1359-1360
[5]   GROWTH, BOLL OPENING RATE, AND FIBER PROPERTIES OF NARROW-ROW COTTON [J].
HEITHOLT, JJ ;
PETTIGREW, WT ;
MEREDITH, WR .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1993, 85 (03) :590-594
[6]   Comparison of cotton genotypes varying in canopy characteristics in 76-cm vs 102-cm rows [J].
Heitholt, JJ ;
Meredith, WR ;
Williford, JR .
CROP SCIENCE, 1996, 36 (04) :955-960
[7]   LIGHT INTERCEPTION AND LINT YIELD OF NARROW-ROW COTTON [J].
HEITHOLT, JJ ;
PETTIGREW, WT ;
MEREDITH, WR .
CROP SCIENCE, 1992, 32 (03) :728-733
[8]   COTTON BOLL RETENTION AND ITS RELATIONSHIP TO LINT YIELD [J].
HEITHOLT, JJ .
CROP SCIENCE, 1993, 33 (03) :486-490
[9]  
HEITHOLT JJ, 1994, CROP SCI, V34, P125, DOI [10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400010022x, 10.2135/cropsci1994.0011183X003400050028x]
[10]  
James D, 1985, P BELTWIDE COTTON PR, P395