Oligoanalgesia in the emergency department:: Short-term beneficial effects of an education program on acute pain

被引:83
作者
Decosterd, Isabelle [1 ]
Hugli, Olivier
Tamches, Emmanuel
Blanc, Catherine
Mouhsine, Elyazid
Givel, Jean-Claude
Yersin, Bertrand
Buclin, Thierry
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Anesthesiol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[2] Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Lausanne, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Hosp Ctr, Dept Surg, Lausanne, Switzerland
[5] Univ Hosp Ctr, Div Clin Pharmacol & Toxicol, Lausanne, Switzerland
[6] Univ Lausanne, Dept Cell Biol & Morphol, Fac Biol & Med, Lausanne, Switzerland
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.01.019
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Study objective: Acute pain is the most frequent complaint in emergency department (ED) admissions, but its management is often neglected, placing patients at risk of oligoanalgesia. We evaluate the effect of the implementation of guidelines for pain management in ED patients with pain at admission or anytime during their stay in our ED. Methods: This prospective pre-post intervention cohort study included data collection both before and after guideline implementation. Consecutive adult patients admitted with acute pain from any cause or with pain at any time after admission were enrolled. The quality of pain management was evaluated according to information in the ED medical records by using a standardized collection form, and its impact on patients was recorded with a questionnaire at discharge. Results: Two hundred forty-nine and 192 patients were included during pre- and postintervention periods. Pain was documented in 61% and 76% of nurse and physician notes, respectively, versus 78% and 85% after the intervention (difference 17%/9%; 95% confidence interval [Cl] 8% to 26%/2% to 17%, respectively). Administration of analgesia increased from 40% to 63% (difference 23%; 95% Cl 13% to 32%) and of morphine from 10% to 27% (difference 17%; 95% Cl 10% to 24%). Mean doses of intravenous morphine increased from 2.4 mg (95% Cl 1.9 to 2.9 mg) to 4.6 mg (95% Cl 3.9 to 5.3 mg); administration of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and acetaminophen increased as well. There was a greater reduction of visual analogue scale score after intervention: 2.1 cm (95% Cl 1.7 to 2.4 cm) versus 2.9 cm (95% Cl 2.5 to 3.3 cm), which was associated with improved patient satisfaction. Conclusion: Education program and guidelines implementation for pain management lead to improved pain management, analgesia, and patient satisfaction in the ED.
引用
收藏
页码:462 / 471
页数:10
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]  
Alonso-Serra Hector M, 2003, Prehosp Emerg Care, V7, P482
[2]  
*AM MED ASS, PAIN MAN BARR PAIN M
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Ann Emerg Med, V44, P198
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1996, CANC PAIN REL GUID O
[5]   Physician and patient factors influencing the treatment of low back pain [J].
Bartfield, JM ;
Salluzzo, RF ;
RaccioRobak, N ;
Funk, DL ;
Verdile, VP .
PAIN, 1997, 73 (02) :209-211
[6]  
Blank F S, 2001, J Emerg Nurs, V27, P327, DOI 10.1067/men.2001.116648
[7]  
CARNS P, ASESSEMENT MANAGEMEN
[8]   Do patients receive adequate pain control after discharge from the ED? [J].
Chan, L ;
Verdile, VP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 16 (07) :705-707
[9]   The visual analogue pain intensity scale: what is moderate pain in millimetres? [J].
Collins, SL ;
Moore, RA ;
McQuay, HJ .
PAIN, 1997, 72 (1-2) :95-97
[10]   The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care [J].
Cordell, WH ;
Keene, KK ;
Giles, BK ;
Jones, JB ;
Jones, JH ;
Brizendine, EJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 2002, 20 (03) :165-169