Regionalization of high-risk surgery and implications for patient travel times

被引:260
作者
Birkmeyer, JD [1 ]
Siewers, AE
Marth, NJ
Goodman, DC
机构
[1] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Sect Gen Surg, Dept Surg, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[2] Dartmouth Hitchcock Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Lebanon, NH 03756 USA
[3] Dartmouth Coll Sch Med, Ctr Evaluat Clin Sci, Hanover, NH USA
[4] Maine Med Ctr, Ctr Outcomes Res & Evaluat, Portland, ME 04102 USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 2003年 / 290卷 / 20期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.290.20.2703
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context Given the strong volume-outcome relationships observed with many surgical procedures, restricting some procedures to hospitals exceeding a minimum volume standard is advocated. However, such regionalization policies might cause unreasonable travel burdens for surgical patients. Objective To estimate how minimum volume standards for esophagectomy and pancreatic resection would affect how long patients must travel for these procedures. Design, Setting, and Patients Simulated trial based on Medicare claims and US road network data. All US hospitals in the 48 continental states were in the study if their surgical procedures included esophagectomy and pancreatic resection. Data from Medicare patients (N=15796) undergoing these 2 procedures for cancer between 1994 and 1999 were used. Main Outcome Measure Additional travel time for patients required to change to higher-volume centers as a result of alternative hospital volume standards (procedures per year). Results With low-volume standards (1 /year for pancreatectomy; 2/year for esophagectomy), approximately 15% of patients would change to higher-volume centers, with negligible effect on their travel times. Most patients would need to travel less than 30 additional minutes (74% pancreatectomy; 76% esophagectomy). Many patients already lived closer to a higher-volume hospital (25% pancreatectomy; 26% esophagectomy). Conversely, with very high-volume standards (>16/year for pancreatectomy; >19/year for esophagectomy), approximately 80% of patients would change to higher-volume centers. More than 50% of these patients would increase their travel time by more than 60 minutes. Travel times would increase most for patients living in rural areas. Conclusions Many patients travel pasta higher-volume center to undergo surgery at a low-volume hospital. If not set too high, hospital volume standards could be implemented for selected operations without imposing unreasonable travel burdens on patients.
引用
收藏
页码:2703 / 2708
页数:6
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]   Impact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery [J].
Begg, CB ;
Cramer, LD ;
Hoskins, WJ ;
Brennan, MF .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 280 (20) :1747-1751
[2]   Raising the bar for pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Birkmeyer, JD .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2002, 9 (09) :826-827
[3]   Effect of hospital volume on in-hospital mortality with pancreaticoduodenectomy [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Finlayson, SRG ;
Tosteson, ANA ;
Sharp, SM ;
Warshaw, AL ;
Fisher, ES .
SURGERY, 1999, 125 (03) :250-256
[4]   Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. [J].
Birkmeyer, JD ;
Siewers, AE ;
Finlayson, EVA ;
Stukel, TA ;
Lucas, FL ;
Batista, I ;
Welch, HG ;
Wennberg, DE .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1128-1137
[5]   Can regionalization decrease the number of deaths for children who undergo cardiac surgery? A theoretical analysis [J].
Chang, RKR ;
Klitzner, TS .
PEDIATRICS, 2002, 109 (02) :173-181
[6]   Invited commentary: Quality of care and the volume-outcome relationship - What's next for surgery? [J].
Daley, J .
SURGERY, 2002, 131 (01) :16-18
[7]   Volume and outcome - It is time to move ahead. [J].
Epstein, AM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 346 (15) :1161-1164
[8]   The distance to community medical care and the likelihood of hospitalization: Is close always better? [J].
Goodman, DC ;
Fisher, E ;
Stukel, TA ;
Chang, CH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1997, 87 (07) :1144-1150
[9]   SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC-FACTORS IN THE CHOICE OF LUNG-CANCER TREATMENT - A POPULATION-BASED STUDY IN 2 RURAL STATES [J].
GREENBERG, ER ;
CHUTE, CG ;
STUKEL, T ;
BARON, JA ;
FREEMAN, DH ;
YATES, J ;
KORSON, R .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1988, 318 (10) :612-617
[10]   REGIONALIZATION OF CARDIAC-SURGERY IN THE UNITED-STATES AND CANADA - GEOGRAPHIC ACCESS, CHOICE, AND OUTCOMES [J].
GRUMBACH, K ;
ANDERSON, GM ;
LUFT, HS ;
ROOS, LL ;
BROOK, R .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 274 (16) :1282-1288