Are 10 wet swallows an appropriate sample of esophageal motility? Yes and no

被引:8
作者
Jalil, S [1 ]
Sperandio, M [1 ]
Tutuian, R [1 ]
Castell, DO [1 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
关键词
esophageal motility; manometric studies; wet swallows;
D O I
10.1097/00004836-200401000-00008
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Traditionally 10 wet swallows are used to assess esophageal motility. Given this relative small number of swallows concerns have been raised whether the abnormal findings based on 10 wet swallows would persist with another set of 10 wet swallows. Purpose: To evaluate whether 10 wet swallows during esophageal manometry is an adequate sampling of esophageal motility. Methods: Over a 4-month-period 100 consecutive patients (excluding patients with achalasia) were given 20 liquid (5 ml each) swallows. The standard manometry technique in our laboratory was performed using 10 wet swallows with pressure transducers placed 4 cm and 9 cm above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The diagnosis was based on the initial 10 swallows. The additional 10 swallows were blinded and separately analyzed, then compared with the initial swallows for each patient. Results: Of the 100 studies (64 women; mean age 5 1; range 21-85), 91 had a consistent diagnosis for both pairs of 10 swallows. The number of abnormal swallows (ineffective or simultaneous) differed between the 2 sets of 10 swallows in 9 patients, but, when the first 10 were analyzed vs. all 20 swallows only 2 patients had discordant diagnoses. There was an excellent agreement between the 1st and 2nd set of 10 swallows (kappa = 0.846) and between the first 10 and all 20 swallows (kappa = 0.965). Conclusions: Ten wet swallows are sufficient for making a manometric diagnosis, because additional swallows are likely to change the diagnosis in only 2% of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:30 / 34
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   WATER SWALLOWS VERSUS FOOD INGESTION AS MANOMETRIC TESTS FOR ESOPHAGEAL DYSFUNCTION [J].
ALLEN, ML ;
ORR, WC ;
MELLOW, MH ;
ROBINSON, MG .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1988, 95 (03) :831-833
[2]  
Castell JA, 1999, ESOPHAGUS, P101
[3]   ACCURACY OF ABBREVIATED MANOMETRY IN DETECTING ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY ABNORMALITIES [J].
CLOUSE, RE ;
WEINSTOCK, LB ;
FERNEY, DM .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1989, 34 (01) :66-70
[4]  
DEVAULT K, 1987, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V82, P754
[5]  
DIEDRICH L, 2000, ESOPHAGEAL MOTILITY, P41
[6]  
DODDS WJ, 1973, J APPL PHYSIOL, V35, P851
[7]   EFFECT OF DRY SWALLOWS AND WET SWALLOWS OF DIFFERENT VOLUMES ON ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALSIS [J].
HOLLIS, JB ;
CASTELL, DO .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, 1975, 38 (06) :1161-1164
[8]   ALTERATION OF ESOPHAGEAL PERISTALSIS BY BODY POSITION [J].
KAYE, MD ;
WEXLER, RM .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1981, 26 (10) :897-901
[9]  
NOVAIS L, 1990, Dysphagia, V5, P187, DOI 10.1007/BF02412686
[10]   ESOPHAGEAL MANOMETRY IN 95 HEALTHY ADULT VOLUNTEERS - VARIABILITY OF PRESSURES WITH AGE AND FREQUENCY OF ABNORMAL CONTRACTIONS [J].
RICHTER, JE ;
WU, WC ;
JOHNS, DN ;
BLACKWELL, JN ;
NELSON, JL ;
CASTELL, JA ;
CASTELL, DO .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 1987, 32 (06) :583-592