Systems Approach to daily clinical care

被引:7
作者
Arora, Sonal [1 ]
Sevdalis, Nick [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Clin Safety Res Unit, Dept Surg & Canc, London W2 1PG, England
关键词
Safety; Training; Human factors; Human error; Systems Approach; OF-THE-LITERATURE; OPERATING-THEATER; NONTECHNICAL SKILLS; PATIENT SAFETY; SURGICAL-TEAMS; SURGERY; TEAMWORK; SIMULATIONS; JUDGMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijsu.2009.12.007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Safety and quality of healthcare provision are affected by a number of factors. These factors include the clinical skills of the treating surgeon or other physician, but also the way practitioners think and behave as members of a healthcare team, and the clinical environment in which care is provided. We first discuss Bahal et al.'s paper as a demonstration of the Systems Approach to clinical performance and patient safety. We then highlight recent advances driven by the Systems Approach in understanding and measuring clinical decision-making, teamworking, and the clinical environment. We conclude that human factors research can provide an understanding of how to balance conflicting opinions and priorities in clinical care with the best interests of the patient, in a manner which allows each doctor to fulfil their duty of care. (C) 2009 Surgical Associates Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:164 / 166
页数:3
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Arora S, IMPACT STRE IN PRESS
[2]   Managing intraoperative stress: what do surgeons want from a crisis training program? [J].
Arora, Sonal ;
Sevdalis, Nick ;
Nestel, Debra ;
Tierney, Tanya ;
Woloshynowych, Maria ;
Kneebone, Roger .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 197 (04) :537-543
[3]   Vignette studies of medical choice and judgement to study caregivers' medical decision behaviour:: systematic review [J].
Bachmann, Lucas M. ;
Muehleisen, Andrea ;
Bock, Annekatrin ;
ter Riet, Gerben ;
Held, Ulrike ;
Kessels, Alfons G. H. .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[4]   A bleeding controversy: Duties and decisions in the face of conflicting advice [J].
Bahal, Nawal ;
Papanikitas, Andrew ;
Sokol, Daniel K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 8 (01) :32-34
[5]   A systems approach to surgical safety [J].
Calland, JF ;
Guerlain, S ;
Adams, RB ;
Tribble, CG ;
Foley, E ;
Chekan, EG .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2002, 16 (06) :1005-1014
[6]  
Donaldson Liam, 2005, Int J Surg, V3, P7, DOI 10.1016/j.ijsu.2005.03.019
[7]   The role of non-technical skills in anaesthesia: a review of current literature [J].
Fletcher, GCL ;
McGeorge, P ;
Flin, RH ;
Glavin, RJ ;
Maran, NJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2002, 88 (03) :418-429
[8]   Interruptions in healthcare: Theoretical views [J].
Grundgeiger, Tobias ;
Sanderson, Penelope .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2009, 78 (05) :293-307
[9]   Mapping surgical practice decision making: an interview study to evaluate decisions in surgical care [J].
Jacklin, Ros ;
Sevdalis, Nick ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Vincent, Charles .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 195 (05) :689-696
[10]   Judgment analysis: a method for quantitative evaluation of trainee surgeons' judgments of surgical risk [J].
Jacklin, Ros ;
Sevdalis, Nick ;
Harries, Clare ;
Darzi, Ara ;
Vincent, Charles .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 195 (02) :183-188