GM foods and the misperception of risk perception

被引:260
作者
Gaskell, G [1 ]
Allum, N
Wagner, W
Kronberger, N
Torgersen, H
Hampel, J
Bardes, J
机构
[1] London Sch Econ, Ctr Anal Risk & Regulat, London WC2A 2AE, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Guildford GU2 5XH, Surrey, England
[3] Johannes Kepler Univ Linz, Linz, Austria
[4] Austrian Acad Sci, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
[5] Univ Stuttgart, D-7000 Stuttgart, Germany
[6] IEP, Paris, France
关键词
biotechnology; decision theory; risk communication; risk perception;
D O I
10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00421.x
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Public opposition to genetically modified (GM) food and crops is widely interpreted as the result of the public's misperception of the risks. With scientific assessment pointing to no unique risks from GM crops and foods, a strategy of accurate risk communication from trusted sources has been advocated. This is based on the assumption that the benefits of GM crops and foods are self-evident. Informed by the interpretation of some qualitative interviews with lay people, we use data from the Eurobarometer survey on biotechnology to explore the hypothesis that it is not so much the perception of risks as the absence of benefits that is the basis of the widespread rejection of GM foods and crops by the European public. Some respondents perceive both risks and benefits, and may be trading off these attributes along the lines of a rational choice model. However, for others, one attribute-benefit-appears to dominate their judgments: the lexicographic heuristic. For these respondents, their perception of risk is of limited importance in the formation of attitudes toward GM food and crops. The implication is that the absence of perceived benefits from GM foods and crops calls into question the relevance of risk communication strategies for bringing about change in public opinion.
引用
收藏
页码:185 / 194
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1998, Survey Methodology
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1985, PERILOUS PROGR MANAG
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1992, SOCIAL THEORIES RISK
  • [4] [Anonymous], ANN M SOC RISK AN NE
  • [5] EUROPEAN PUBLIC PERCEPTIONS OF SCIENCE
    BAUER, M
    DURANT, J
    EVANS, G
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 1994, 6 (02) : 163 - 186
  • [6] Assessing the capacity of mass electorates
    Converse, PE
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 3 : 331 - 353
  • [7] CONVERSE PE, 1964, IDEOLOGY DISCONTENT
  • [8] Cvetkovich G.T., 1999, SOCIAL TRUST MANAGEM
  • [9] Douglas Mary., 1982, RISK CULTURE ESSAY S
  • [10] Edwards W., 1967, DECISION MAKING SELE