Ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate susceptibility testing of Escherichia coli isolates with different β-lactam resistance phenotypes

被引:25
作者
Oliver, A [1 ]
Pérez-Vázquez, M [1 ]
Martínez-Ferrer, M [1 ]
Baquero, F [1 ]
De Rafael, L [1 ]
Cantón, R [1 ]
机构
[1] Hosp Ramon & Cajal, Microbiol Serv, E-28034 Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1128/AAC.43.4.862
中图分类号
Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The activities of ampicillin-sulbactam and amoxicillin-clavulanate were studied,vith 100 selected clinical Escherichia coli isolates with different beta-lactam susceptibility phenotypes by standard agar dilution and disk diffusion techniques and with a commercial microdilution system (PASCO). A Bred ratio (2:1) and a fixed concentration (clavulanate, 2 and 4 mu g/ml; sulbactam, 8 mu g/ml) were used in the agar dilution technique. The resistance frequencies for amoxicillin-clavulanate with different techniques were as follows: fixed ratio agar dilution, 12%; fixed concentration 4-mu g/ml agar dilution, 17%; fixed ratio microdilution, 9%; and disk diffusion, 9%. Marked discrepancies were found when these results were compared,vith those obtained,vith ampicillin-sulbactam (26 to 52% resistance), showing that susceptibility to amoxicillin clavulanic acid cannot be predicted by testing the isolate against ampicillin-sulbactam. Interestingly, the discrimination between susceptible and intermediate isolates was better achieved with 4 mu g of clavulanate per mi than with the fixed ratio. In contrast, amoxicillin susceptibility was not sufficiently restored when 2 mu g of clavulanate per mi was used, particularly in moderate (mean beta-lactamase activity, 50.8 mU/mg of protein) and high-level (215 mU/mg) TEM-1 beta-lactamase producer isolates. Four micrograms of clavulanate per milliliter could be a reasonable alternative to the 2:1 fixed ratio, because most high-level beta-lactamase-hyperproducing isolates would be categorized as nonsusceptible, and low- and moderate-level beta-lactamase-producing isolates would be categorized as nonresistant, This approach cannot be applied to sulbactam, either with the fixed 2:1 ratio or with the 8-mu g/ml fixed concentration, because many low-level beta-lactamase-producing isolates would be classified in the resistant category. These findings call for a review of breakpoints for beta-lactam-S lactamase inhibitor combinations.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 867
页数:6
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   VARIATION IN THE POTENTIATION OF BETA-LACTAM ANTIBIOTIC-ACTIVITY BY CLAVULANIC ACID AND SULBACTAM AGAINST MULTIPLY ANTIBIOTIC-RESISTANT BACTERIA [J].
ALDRIDGE, KE ;
SANDERS, CV ;
MARIER, RL .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1986, 17 (04) :463-469
[2]  
BAQUERO F, 1997, REV ESP QUIM, V10, P303
[3]   CHARACTERIZATION OF A NEW TEM-TYPE BETA-LACTAMASE RESISTANT TO CLAVULANATE, SULBACTAM, AND TAZOBACTAM IN A CLINICAL ISOLATE OF ESCHERICHIA-COLI [J].
BLAZQUEZ, J ;
BAQUERO, MR ;
CANTON, R ;
ALOS, I ;
BAQUERO, F .
ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 1993, 37 (10) :2059-2063
[4]  
*COM ANT SOC FRANC, 1996, CLIN MICROBIOL INFEC, V2, pS46
[5]  
FOULDS G, 1986, REV INFECT DIS, V8, pS503
[6]   Fixed or variable concentrations of beta-lactamase inhibitors in in-vitro tests? [J].
Greenwood, D .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 1996, 38 (01) :17-20
[8]  
JARLIER V, 1988, REV INFECT DIS, V10, P867
[9]  
LIU PY, 1997, J ANTIMICROB CHEMOTH, V39, P1
[10]   BETA-LACTAMASES IN LABORATORY AND CLINICAL RESISTANCE [J].
LIVERMORE, DM .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 1995, 8 (04) :557-&