Soil quality assessment under emerging regulatory requirements

被引:105
作者
Bone, James [1 ]
Head, Martin [1 ]
Barraclough, Declan [2 ]
Archer, Michael [2 ,3 ]
Scheib, Catherine [4 ]
Flight, Dee [4 ]
Voulvoulis, Nikolaos [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ctr Environm Policy, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Environm Agcy, Dept Sci, Wallingford OX10 8BD, Oxon, England
[3] ERM, Bristol BS1 2AW, Avon, England
[4] British Geol Survey, Kingsley Dunham Ctr, Keyworth NG12 5GG, Notts, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Soil; Soil degradation; Soil quality; Soil function; Environmental monitoring; EU environmental policies for soil protection; PLANT UPTAKE; ORGANIC-CHEMICALS; RISK-ASSESSMENT; PEDOTRANSFER FUNCTIONS; PHYSICAL-PROPERTIES; AGRICULTURAL SOILS; ENVIRONMENTAL FATE; SEWAGE-SLUDGE; DEGRADATION; CONTAMINANTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.envint.2010.04.010
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
New and emerging policies that aim to set standards for protection and sustainable use of soil are likely to require identification of geographical risk/priority areas. Soil degradation can be seen as the change or disturbance in soil quality and it is therefore crucial that soil and soil quality are well understood to protect soils and to meet legislative requirements. To increase this understanding a review of the soil quality definition evaluated its development, with a formal scientific approach to assessment beginning in the 1970s, followed by a period of discussion and refinement. A number of reservations about soil quality assessment expressed in the literature are summarised. Taking concerns into account, a definition of soil quality incorporating soil's ability to meet multifunctional requirements, to provide ecosystem services, and the potential for soils to affect other environmental media is described. Assessment using this definition requires a large number of soil function dependent indicators that can be expensive, laborious, prone to error, and problematic in comparison. Findings demonstrate the need for a method that is not function dependent, but uses a number of cross-functional indicators instead. This method to systematically prioritise areas where detailed investigation is required, using a ranking based against a desired level of action, could be relatively quick, easy and cost effective. As such this has potential to fill in gaps and compliment existing monitoring programs and assist in development and implementation of current and future soil protection legislation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:609 / 622
页数:14
相关论文
共 198 条
[1]
SOILPAR 2.00:: software to estimate soil hydrological parameters and functions [J].
Acutis, M ;
Donatelli, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2003, 18 (3-4) :373-377
[2]
Alexander M., 1971, AGR RESPONSIBILITY E
[3]
Alker S., 2000, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, V43, P49, DOI [DOI 10.1080/09640560010766, 10.1080/09640560010766]
[4]
Alloway B.J., 1994, Heavy Metals in Soils, VSecond edn
[5]
A multicriteria-based methodology for site prioritisation in sediment management [J].
Alvarez-Guerra, Manuel ;
Viguri, Javier R. ;
Voulvoulis, Nikolaos .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2009, 35 (06) :920-930
[6]
[Anonymous], AN P 2 ANN W PROV C
[7]
[Anonymous], SOIL REM CIRC
[8]
[Anonymous], AGRON ABST
[9]
[Anonymous], 2000, Environmental Science Policy, DOI DOI 10.1016/S1462-9011(00)00102-7
[10]
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN UNION SOIL