Cessation versus continuation of 6-month migraine preventive therapy with topiramate (PROMPT): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

被引:116
作者
Diener, Hans-Christoph [1 ]
Agosti, Reto [2 ]
Allais, Gianni [3 ]
Bergmans, Paul [11 ,12 ]
Bussone, Gennaro [4 ]
Davies, Brendan [5 ]
Ertas, Mustafa [6 ]
Lanteri-Minet, Michel [7 ]
Reuter, Uwe [8 ]
Del Rio, Margarita Sdnchez [9 ]
Schoenen, Jean [10 ]
Schwalen, Susanne
van Oene, Joop [11 ,12 ]
机构
[1] Univ Duisburg Essen, Dept Neurol, D-45122 Essen, Germany
[2] Zurich Hirslanden Headache Ctr, Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Ctr Cefalee Donna, Turin, Italy
[4] Ist Neurol C Besta, Milan, Italy
[5] Univ Hosp N Staffs, Stoke On Trent, Staffs, England
[6] Istanbul Fac Med, Dept Neurol, Istanbul, Turkey
[7] Univ Nice, Hop Pasteur, Ctr Hosp, Dept Evaluat & Traitement Douleur, F-06108 Nice 2, France
[8] Charite, Berlin, Germany
[9] Hosp Ruber Int, Madrid, Spain
[10] Univ Liege, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
[11] Janssen Cilag EMEA, Tilburg, Netherlands
[12] Janssen Cilag EMEA, Neuss, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70272-7
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background Use of preventive therapy for migraine is often recommended for only 6-9 months, but no randomised, placebo-controlled trials have investigated migraine frequency after the end of prophylaxis. We assessed the effects of discontinuation of topiramate after a treatment period of 6 months. Methods 818 patients who have migraines were enrolled from 88 clinics in 21 countries. After a 4-8-week lead-in period, patients received topiramate in a 26-week open-label phase. Daily dose was increased from 25 mg to 100 mg in steps of 25 mg every week; the dose could be adjusted further in the range 50-200 mg/day, but was stable for the final 4 weeks. Patients were randomly assigned to continue this dose or switch to placebo for a 26-week double-blind phase. The primary endpoint was the difference in number of days with migraine during the last 4 weeks of the double-blind phase compared with the last 4 weeks of the open-label phase. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2005-000321-29. Findings 559 patients (68.3%) completed the open-label phase; 514 entered the double-blind phase and were assigned to topiramate (n=255) or placebo (n=259). The mean increase in number of migraine days was greater in the placebo group (1.19 days in 4 weeks, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.66; p < 0.0001) than in the topiramate group (0.10, -0.36 to 0.56; p=0.5756; mean difference between groups -1.09, -1.75 to -0.43). Patients in the placebo group had a greater number of days on acute medication than did those in the topiramate group (mean difference between groups -0.95, -1.49 to -0.41; p=0.0007). Quality of life, as assessed by the MIDAS questionnaire, fell in the placebo group but remained stable in the topiramate group. Patients were more satisfied with the efficacy of topiramate than with that of placebo, whereas satisfaction with tolerability was similar in both treatment groups. Interpretation Sustained benefit was reported after discontinuation of topiramate, although number of migraine days did increase. These findings suggest that patients should be treated for 6 months, with the option to continue to 12 months in some patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1054 / 1062
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Topiramate for migraine prevention - A randomized controlled trial [J].
Brandes, JL ;
Saper, JR ;
Diamond, M ;
Couch, JR ;
Lewis, DW ;
Schmitt, J ;
Neto, W ;
Schwabe, S ;
Jacobs, D .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 291 (08) :965-973
[2]
Topiramate 100 mg/day in migraine prevention: a pooled analysis of double-blind randomised controlled trials [J].
Bussone, G ;
Diener, HC ;
Pfeil, J ;
Schwalen, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2005, 59 (08) :961-968
[3]
One-year prevalence of migraine in Sweden:: a population-based study in adults [J].
Dahlöf, C ;
Linde, M .
CEPHALALGIA, 2001, 21 (06) :664-671
[4]
Topiramate in migraine prophylaxis -: Results from a placebo-controlled trial with propranolol as an active control [J].
Diener, HC ;
Tfelt-Hansen, P ;
Dahlöf, C ;
Láinez, MJA ;
Sandrini, G ;
Wang, SJ ;
Neto, W ;
Vijapurkar, U ;
Doyle, A ;
Jacobs, D .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2004, 251 (08) :943-950
[5]
EFNS guideline on the drug treatment of migraine -: report of an EFNS task force [J].
Evers, S. ;
Afra, J. ;
Frese, A. ;
Goadsby, P. J. ;
Linde, M. ;
May, A. ;
Sandor, P. S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 13 (06) :560-572
[6]
Géraud G, 2004, CLIN THER, V26, P1305
[7]
Divalproex sodium in migraine prophylaxis: A dose-controlled study [J].
Klapper, J .
CEPHALALGIA, 1997, 17 (02) :103-108
[8]
Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy [J].
Lipton, R. B. ;
Bigal, M. E. ;
Diamond, M. ;
Freitag, F. ;
Reed, M. L. ;
Stewart, W. F. .
NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (05) :343-349
[9]
Lipton RB, 2001, HEADACHE, V41, P854
[10]
Prevalence and burden of migraine in the United States: Data from the American Migraine Study II [J].
Lipton, RB ;
Stewart, WF ;
Diamond, S ;
Diamond, ML ;
Reed, M .
HEADACHE, 2001, 41 (07) :646-657