Effects of acoustic distortion and semantic context on lexical access

被引:50
作者
Aydelott, J
Bates, E
机构
[1] Univ London Birkbeck Coll, Sch Psychol, London WC1E 7HX, England
[2] Univ Calif San Diego, Ctr Res Language, San Diego, CA 92103 USA
来源
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES | 2004年 / 19卷 / 01期
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01690960344000099
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
This study explored the role of attentional and perceptual factors in lexical access by examining the effects of acoustic distortion on semantic priming of spoken words by a sentence context. The acoustic manipulations included low-pass filtering, which was intended to interfere with the sensory encoding of the acoustic signal by reducing intelligibility, and time compression, which was intended to disrupt central language processing by reducing processing time. These distortions were applied to the sentence context to explore how the contribution of contextual information to lexical access is affected by acoustic degradation. Low-pass filtering significantly reduced semantic facilitation. In contrast, temporal compression significantly reduced semantic inhibition without affecting facilitation. These qualitative differences between two forms of acoustic distortion are discussed in terms of the activation, selection, and integration of lexical-semantic information in models of lexical access. Filtering may have its primary effect on a relatively early, automatic process (reflected in facilitation effects), while compression has its primary effect on a later, more demanding process (reflected in inhibition effects). Practical and theoretical implications for higher-level language processing in hearing-impaired and elderly populations are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 56
页数:28
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] ALTMANN GTM, 1993, P EUR BERL
  • [2] THE EFFECT OF SUBPHONETIC DIFFERENCES ON LEXICAL ACCESS
    ANDRUSKI, JE
    BLUMSTEIN, SE
    BURTON, M
    [J]. COGNITION, 1994, 52 (03) : 163 - 187
  • [3] [Anonymous], LEXICAL REPRESENTATI
  • [4] Cued shadowing
    Bates, E
    Liu, H
    [J]. LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES, 1996, 11 (06): : 577 - 581
  • [5] INTELLIGIBILITY OF TIME-COMPRESSED SENTENTIAL STIMULI
    BEASLEY, DS
    BRATT, GW
    RINTELMANN, WF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1980, 23 (04): : 722 - 729
  • [6] STANDARDIZATION OF A TEST OF SPEECH-PERCEPTION IN NOISE
    BILGER, RC
    NUETZEL, JM
    RABINOWITZ, WM
    RZECZKOWSKI, C
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1984, 27 (01): : 32 - 48
  • [7] How to milk a coat: The effects of semantic and acoustic information on phoneme categorization
    Borsky, S
    Tuller, B
    Shapiro, LP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1998, 103 (05) : 2670 - 2676
  • [8] THE PROCESSING NATURE OF THE N400 - EVIDENCE FROM MASKED PRIMING
    BROWN, C
    HAGOORT, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (01) : 34 - 44
  • [9] WORDS, PICTURES, AND PRIMING - ON SEMANTIC ACTIVATION, CONSCIOUS IDENTIFICATION, AND THE AUTOMATICITY OF INFORMATION-PROCESSING
    CARR, TH
    MCCAULEY, C
    SPERBER, RD
    PARMELEE, CM
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1982, 8 (06) : 757 - 777
  • [10] VERTICAL SIMILARITY IN SPOKEN WORD RECOGNITION - MULTIPLE LEXICAL ACTIVATION, INDIVIDUAL-DIFFERENCES, AND THE ROLE OF SENTENCE CONTEXT
    CONNINE, CM
    BLASKO, DG
    WANG, J
    [J]. PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1994, 56 (06): : 624 - 636