The fundamental psychometric status of neuropsychological batteries

被引:52
作者
Russell, EW [1 ]
Russell, SLK [1 ]
Hill, BD [1 ]
机构
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
关键词
neuropsychology; assessment; fixed battery; standardization; validation; interpretation; clinical judgment;
D O I
10.1016/j.acn.2005.05.001
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A fundamental requirement for neuropsychological assessment is dependability. Neuropsychological knowledge is dependable only if it has been validated using psychometric methods. Since batteries are used for interpretations, the psychometric validation methods that are acceptable for individual tests must be applied to batteries to produce dependable information. While the standardized battery has been validated, the flexible battery has not. Due to the probability that some tests will be impaired by chance, a flexible battery cannot produce dependable interpretations by selecting or combining test results. Localization and diagnostic assessments are obtained by comparisons. Comparisons require that the tests in a battery are invariant or have equivalent norms along with a common metric. While standardized batteries do meet these criteria, flexible batteries do not. Consequently, clinical judgment applied to a flexible battery cannot provide dependable knowledge beyond that which could be provided by a single validated individual test. (c) 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of National Academy of Neuropsychology.
引用
收藏
页码:785 / 794
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]  
American Educational Research Association, 1999, Standards for educational and psychological testing
[2]  
Anastasi A., 1997, Psychological testing
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, STUDYING CLIN JUDGEM
[4]  
Bauer RM, 2000, CLIN GUIDE NEUROPSYC, P419
[5]  
Franzen M.D., 2000, RELIABILITY VALIDITY, V2nd
[6]   Judgment research and neuropsychological assessment: A narrative review and meta-analyses [J].
Garb, HN ;
Schramke, CJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (01) :140-153
[7]  
Ghiselli E.E., 1981, Measurement theory for the behavioral sciences
[8]  
Golden CJ, 1991, LURIA NEBRASKA NEURO
[9]  
GOLDMAN JE, 1998, NEUROSCI INTELL UNIT, V3, P3
[10]  
GOLDSTEIN G, 1997, CRIT ISS NE, P67