An evaluation of the international maritime organization's gaseous agents test protocol

被引:4
作者
Forssell, EW [1 ]
Back, GG
Beyler, CL
DiNenno, PJ
Hansen, R
Beene, D
机构
[1] Hughes Associates Inc, Baltimore, MD 21227 USA
[2] US Coast Guard Res & Dev Ctr, Groton, CT 06340 USA
关键词
fire; fire suppressant; firefighting agents; IMO protocol; Halon 1301 alternative agents; fire testing; marine;
D O I
10.1023/A:1011697419034
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The International Maritime Organization (IMO) Maritime Safety Committee's (MSC) subcommittee on fire protection (FP) has developed a test protocol for evaluating the extinguishing effectiveness and critical design parameters of fixed gaseous halon alternative fire extinguishing systems. This paper is an evaluation of the developed protocol based upon its effectiveness in verifying agent distribution throughout the protected space and the effectiveness of the agent against typical maritime fire scenarios. The testing described herein was conducted by the U.S. Coast Guard as part of their evaluation of the developed protocol. Four "halocarbon" agents (NAF-SIII, CEA-410, CEA-308 and FM-200), one "inert" agent (Inergen), one gas/powder mix (Envirogel), and Halon 1301 for baseline comparisons were evaluated with the protocol. The IMO Protocol was found to represent a reasonable basis for evaluating the effectiveness of fixed gaseous fire extinguishing systems. However, the results from testing with the protocol are subject to interpretation due to the lack of a definition of the end of the discharge time. The four fire scenarios that make up the protocol can better meet their respective objectives by modifying the scenarios to reduce the impact on extinguishment of variables other than the uniform addition of agent throughout the space (e.g., oxygen depletion, localized high agent concentrations, and localized high flow velocities).
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 67
页数:31
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
BACK GG, 1997, CGD2497 MAR FIR SAF
[2]  
BACK GG, 1998, CGD0299 MAR FIR SAF
[3]  
DINENNO PJ, 1991, EVALUATION PERFLUORO
[4]  
DUMAYAS W, 1993, EFFECTS CORROSIVE TH
[5]  
FORSSELL EW, 1994, EVALUATION ALTERNATI
[6]  
HANSEN R, 1994, 1994 INT CFC HAL ALT
[7]  
Henley EJ, 1981, EQUILIBRIUM STAGE SE
[8]  
*HUGH ASS INC, 1995, EL DAT PROC IND
[9]  
*INT MAR ORG, 1998, GUID APPR EQ GAS FIR
[10]  
KIM AK, 1999, J FIRE PROTECTION EN, V10