Performance assessment of HCFC-22 window air conditioner retrofitted with R-407C

被引:42
作者
Devotta, S [1 ]
Padalkar, AS
Sane, NK
机构
[1] Natl Environm Engn Res Inst, Nagpur 440020, Maharashtra, India
[2] Natl Chem Lab, Proc Chem Div, Pune 411008, Maharashtra, India
[3] Walchand Coll Engn, Dept Mech Engn, Sangli 416415, India
关键词
R-407C; performance; cooling capacity; COP; measurement; power consumption;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.03.002
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
This paper presents the experimental performance analysis of a 1.5 TR window air-conditioner, retrofitted with R-407C, as a substitute to HCFC-22. Experimental results showed that R-407C, for the operating conditions covered in this study, had lower cooling capacity in the range 2.1-7.9% with respect to HCFC-22. The coefficient of performance for R-407C was lower in the range 7.9-13.5%. The power consumption of the unit with R-407C was higher in the range 6-7% than HCFC-22. The discharge pressures for R-407C were higher in the range 11-13% than HCFC-22. This paper also presents simulation results of heat exchangers of an HCFC-22 window air conditioner retrofitted with R-407C. The simulation has been carried out using EVAP-COND, a heat exchanger model developed by National Institute of Standards and Technology, U.S.A. The simulated evaporator capacities are within +/- 3% of the experimentally measured cooling capacities for both refrigerants. Simulation results for R-407C and HCFC-22 are compared. The exit temperatures of R-407C are lower by 1.9 degrees C to 5.2 degrees C in the condenser and are higher by 3.2 degrees C to 3.8 degrees C in the evaporator than HCFC-22. Evaporating pressures of R-407C are higher by 4.5-5.3% as compared to HCFC-22. The pressure drops of R-407C are lower in both the evaporator and the condenser as compared to HCFC-22. The outlet temperatures of air for HCFC-22 and R-407C in both heat exchangers are nearly the same. (c) 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2937 / 2949
页数:13
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*ARI, 1997, SOFT OPT SYST TEST C
[2]  
Bureau of Indian Standards, 1992, IS1391 BUR IND STAND
[3]   Alternatives to HCFC-22 for air conditioners [J].
Devotta, S ;
Waghmare, AV ;
Sawant, NN ;
Domkundwar, BM .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2001, 21 (06) :703-715
[4]  
DEVOTTA S, 2003, P 21 IIR INT C REFR
[5]  
DEVOTTA S, 2002, P 1L INT COMPR ENG C
[6]  
Devotta S, 2000, P 4 IIR GUST LOR C N, P17
[7]  
DOMANSKI PA, 1999, P 20 INT C REFR IIR
[8]  
DONGSOO J, 2000, INT J REFRIG, V23, P466
[9]  
*JAP AIR COND, 2002, HEAT REFRIGERAT 0525
[10]   A heat exchanger model for mixtures and pure refrigerant cycle simulations [J].
Judge, J ;
Radermacher, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REFRIGERATION-REVUE INTERNATIONALE DU FROID, 1997, 20 (04) :244-255