Use of the alkaline comet assay for industrial genotoxicity screening:: comparative investigation with the micronucleus test

被引:80
作者
Hartmann, A [1 ]
Elhajouji, A [1 ]
Kiskinis, E [1 ]
Poetter, F [1 ]
Martus, HJ [1 ]
Fjällman, A [1 ]
Frieauff, W [1 ]
Suter, W [1 ]
机构
[1] Novartis Pharma AG, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
关键词
high-throughput screen; cytotoxicity; comet assay;
D O I
10.1016/S0278-6915(01)00031-X
中图分类号
TS2 [食品工业];
学科分类号
0832 ;
摘要
We evaluated the suitability of the alkaline comet assay as a screening test in industrial routine testing of new chemicals. Thirty six pharmaceutical compounds with unknown genotoxic potential were tested comparatively in the comet assay and micronucleus test (MNT) using V79 Chinese hamster cells. The comparison of results is generally based on at least two independent experiments, each with two replicate cultures at a minimum of three concentrations. We found a high degree of concordance between results of the comet assay and MNT. All compounds with negative MNT results were also negative in the comet assay. All positive compounds in the comet assay were also positive in the MNT. However, 16 of 38 positive MNT results were negative in the comet assay. Some of the contrary findings may be due to aneugenic effects, which are detected in the MNT but not in the comet assay. However, the majority of the contrary results may be a consequence of cytotoxicity, which can induce elevated micronucleus frequencies but may not lead to positive effects in the comet assay. Additional data of 39 compounds tested in the Ames test and the comet assay were compared. Four of these compounds that were Ames positive were also positive in the comet assay. However, the comet assay also detected 16 compounds that were negative in the Ames test. We believe that the comet assay in vitro is a useful, fast screening system in mammalian cells that can be used in a test battery during drug development. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:843 / 858
页数:16
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Aneuploidy: a report of an ECETOC task force [J].
Aardema, MJ ;
Albertini, S ;
Arni, P ;
Henderson, LM ;
Kirsch-Volders, M ;
Mackay, JM ;
Sarrif, AM ;
Stringer, DA ;
Taalman, RDF .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 1998, 410 (01) :3-79
[2]   GUIDE FOR THE SALMONELLA-TYPHIMURIUM MAMMALIAN MICROSOME TESTS FOR BACTERIAL MUTAGENICITY [J].
CLAXTON, LD ;
ALLEN, J ;
AULETTA, A ;
MORTELMANS, K ;
NESTMANN, E ;
ZEIGER, E .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1987, 189 (02) :83-91
[3]   Automatic analysis of the in vitro micronucleus test on V79 cells [J].
Frieauff, W ;
Pötter-Locher, F ;
Cordier, A ;
Suter, W .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 413 (01) :57-68
[4]   The contribution of cytotoxicity to DNA-effects in the single cell gel test (comet assay) [J].
Hartmann, A ;
Speit, G .
TOXICOLOGY LETTERS, 1997, 90 (2-3) :183-188
[5]  
Hartmann A., 2000, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, V35, P28
[6]   The ability of the Comet assay to discriminate between genotoxins and cytotoxins [J].
Henderson, L ;
Wolfreys, A ;
Fedyk, J ;
Bourner, G ;
Windebank, S .
MUTAGENESIS, 1998, 13 (01) :89-94
[7]   Single cell gel electrophoresis assay:: a new technique for human biomonitoring studies [J].
Kassie, F ;
Parzefall, W ;
Knasmüller, S .
MUTATION RESEARCH-REVIEWS IN MUTATION RESEARCH, 2000, 463 (01) :13-31
[8]   Interpretation of the biological relevance of genotoxicity test results:: the importance of thresholds [J].
Kirkland, DJ ;
Müller, L .
MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2000, 464 (01) :137-147
[9]   REVISED METHODS FOR THE SALMONELLA MUTAGENICITY TEST [J].
MARON, DM ;
AMES, BN .
MUTATION RESEARCH, 1983, 113 (3-4) :173-215
[10]  
Merk O, 1999, ENVIRON MOL MUTAGEN, V33, P167, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2280(1999)33:2<167::AID-EM9>3.0.CO