Comparison of the effects of amlodipine and diltiazem on 24-hour blood pressure, plasma catecholamines, and left ventricular mass

被引:51
作者
Leenen, FHH
Fourney, A
机构
[1] Hypertension Unit, Division of Cardiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ont.
[2] Hypertension Unit, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ont. K1Y 4E9
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9149(96)90396-3
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
In 30 patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension and high-normal left ventricular (LV) mass, the effects of treatment for 6 months with amlodipine (5 to 10 mg every morning) versus diltiazem-sustained release (SR) (90 to 180 mg twice daily) on 24-hour blood pressure (BP), plasma catecholamines, and echocardiographic estimates of LV mass and function were evaluated, Both amlodipine and diltiazem caused stable, persistent BP reduction over 24 hours with no evidence for a ''peak'' effect, For a similar decrease in diastolic BP, amlodipine caused a significantly larger decrease in systolic BP, Amlodipine decreased BP by lowering total peripheral resistance, whereas diltiazem caused small decreases in both total peripheral resistance and cardiac index, Both calcium antagonists caused modest but significant decreases in supine and standing plasma catecholamines. LV wall thickness and LV mass decreased significantly over the 6 months of follow-up: -6 +/- 2 with diltiazem and -10 +/- 2 g/m(2) with amlodipine. In patients taking amlodipine, the decrease in LV mass correlated significantly with the decrease in plasma norepinephrine. In contrast to rapid-acting calcium antagonists, both amlodipine and diltiazem-SR cause smooth BP control and an appropriate decrease in LV mass without activation of the sympathetic nervous system.
引用
收藏
页码:203 / 207
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   A COMPARATIVE-ASSESSMENT OF AMLODIPINE AND FELODIPINE ER - PHARMACOKINETIC AND PHARMACODYNAMIC INDEXES [J].
BAINBRIDGE, AD ;
HERLIHY, O ;
MEREDITH, PA ;
ELLIOTT, HL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1993, 45 (05) :425-430
[2]  
CRUICKSHANK JM, 1992, J HUM HYPERTENS, V6, P85
[3]   DIFFERENTIAL-EFFECTS OF THE CALCIUM-ANTAGONIST, NISOLDIPINE, VERSUS THE ARTERIAL VASODILATOR, MINOXIDIL, ON VENTRICULAR ANATOMY, INTRAVASCULAR VOLUME, AND SYMPATHETIC ACTIVITY IN RATS [J].
FIELDS, N ;
TSOPORIS, J ;
LEENEN, FHH .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1989, 14 (06) :826-835
[4]   ARTERIAL-PRESSURE AND HEART-RATE RESPONSES TO CALCIUM-CHANNEL BLOCKERS ADMINISTERED IN THE BRAIN-STEM IN RATS [J].
HIGUCHI, S ;
TAKESHITA, A ;
ITO, N ;
IMAIZUMI, T ;
MATSUGUCHI, H ;
NAKAMURA, M .
CIRCULATION RESEARCH, 1985, 57 (02) :244-251
[5]   ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY WITH DILTIAZEM AND COMPARISON WITH HYDROCHLOROTHIAZIDE [J].
INOUYE, IK ;
MASSIE, BM ;
BENOWITZ, N ;
SIMPSON, P ;
LOGE, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1984, 53 (11) :1588-1592
[6]   SYMPATHETIC HYPERACTIVITY AND CORONARY RISK IN HYPERTENSION [J].
JULIUS, S .
HYPERTENSION, 1993, 21 (06) :886-893
[7]   DIVERGENT EFFECTS OF DIHYDROPYRIDINE AND PHENYLALKYLAMINE CALCIUM-CHANNEL ANTAGONIST CLASSES ON AUTONOMIC FUNCTION IN HUMAN HYPERTENSION [J].
KAILASAM, MT ;
PARMER, RJ ;
CERVENKA, JH ;
WU, RA ;
ZIEGLER, MG ;
KENNEDY, BP ;
ADEGBILE, IA ;
OCONNOR, DT .
HYPERTENSION, 1995, 26 (01) :143-149
[8]  
KLEIN W, 1983, CIRC RES, V52, P174
[9]  
KUSHIRO T, 1995, AM J HYPERTENS, V8, pA72
[10]   ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUGS AND CARDIAC TROPHIC MECHANISMS [J].
LEENEN, FHH ;
HARMSEN, E .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR PHARMACOLOGY, 1991, 17 :S50-S57