What does "through-bond coupling" mean? observations on simple donor-acceptor systems

被引:19
作者
Macatangay, AV [1 ]
Endicott, JF [1 ]
Song, XQ [1 ]
机构
[1] Wayne State Univ, Dept Chem, Detroit, MI 48202 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/jp981876j
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
A series of covalently linked, transition-metal donor/acceptor complexes are described in which the net donor-acceptor coupling matrix element, H-DA, is independent of the extent of coupling between the donor and the bridging ligand. The bridging ligand in these complexes is a transition-metal dicyano complex with a tetraaza aliphatic nonbridging ligand, cis- or trans-M(MCL)(CN)(2)(+) for M = Rh(III), Co(III), or Cr(III), donor = RU(NH3)(5)(2+), and the acceptor = Ru(NH3)(5)(3+). The electronic coupling land electron delocalization) between the donor and the central atom (M) of the bridging ligand varies from H-DL approximate to 10(3) to similar to 3 x 10(3) cm(-1) through the series of M(MCL)(CN)(2)(+)-bridged complexes, and this variation has an effect on the energy of the Ru(II)/Ru(III) CT absorption maximum, which is expected from perturbational mixing of these electronic states. However, the usually correlated superexchange contribution to H-DA is not observed and appears to be less than about 10% of the contribution predicted. This is in contrast to observations on related complexes with pyridyl-type bridging ligands. The unusual behavior can be a consequence of the dependence of D/A electronic coupling on the CN- vibrational distortions and the mixing of the two Ru(II)/Ru(III) electron-transfer states with the BL state promoted by in-phase and out-of-phase combinations of CN- stretches. Such an approach predicts very little superexchange coupling when there is little electron delocalization onto the bridging ligand and requires that H-DA be a strong function of the electron-transfer coordinates.
引用
收藏
页码:7537 / 7540
页数:4
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
BALZANI V, 1996, COMPREHENSIVE SUPRAM, V10, P1
[2]   ELECTRON-TUNNELING PATHWAYS IN RUTHENATED PROTEINS [J].
BERATAN, DN ;
ONUCHIC, JN ;
BETTS, JN ;
BOWLER, BE ;
GRAY, HB .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 1990, 112 (22) :7915-7921
[3]  
Bersuker I., 1992, ADV CHEM PHYS, V81, P703
[4]   Physical factors governing the amplitude of the electron transfer integral in mixed-valence compounds [J].
Calzado, CJ ;
Malrieu, JP ;
Sanz, JF .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1998, 102 (21) :3659-3667
[5]   Generalization of the Mulliken-Hush treatment for the calculation of electron transfer matrix elements [J].
Cave, RJ ;
Newton, MD .
CHEMICAL PHYSICS LETTERS, 1996, 249 (1-2) :15-19
[6]   DISTANCE, STEREOELECTRONIC EFFECTS, AND THE MARCUS INVERTED REGION IN INTRAMOLECULAR ELECTRON-TRANSFER IN ORGANIC RADICAL-ANIONS [J].
CLOSS, GL ;
CALCATERRA, LT ;
GREEN, NJ ;
PENFIELD, KW ;
MILLER, JR .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1986, 90 (16) :3673-3683
[7]   CYANO-BRIDGED COMPLEXES OF TRANS-TETRAKIS(PYRIDINE)RUTHENIUM(II) [J].
COE, BJ ;
MEYER, TJ ;
WHITE, PS .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1995, 34 (14) :3600-3609
[8]   MIXED-VALENCE COMPLEXES OF D5-D6 METAL CENTERS [J].
CREUTZ, C .
PROGRESS IN INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1983, 30 :1-73
[9]   Optical control of photogenerated ion pair lifetimes: An approach to a molecular switch [J].
Debreczeny, MP ;
Svec, WA ;
Wasielewski, MR .
SCIENCE, 1996, 274 (5287) :584-587
[10]   REDOX ASYMMETRY AND METAL METAL COUPLING IN PYRAZINE-BRIDGED RUTHENIUM DIMERS [J].
DELAROSA, R ;
CHANG, PJ ;
SALAYMEH, F ;
CURTIS, JC .
INORGANIC CHEMISTRY, 1985, 24 (25) :4229-4231