Vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt in twin pregnancies:: Is it safe?

被引:40
作者
Cahill, A
Stamilio, DM
Paré, E
Peipert, JP
Stevens, EJ
Nelson, DB
Macones, GA
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Div Maternal Fetal Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Ctr Clin Epidemiol & Biostat, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[3] Univ Penn, Sch Med, Dept Biostat & Epidemiol, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[4] Univ Penn, Leonard Davis Inst Hlth Econ, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[5] Brown Univ, Sch Med, Women & Infants Hosp, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
cesarean delivery; vaginal birth; twins;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2005.06.038
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare the rate of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) attempt, VBAC failure, and major maternal adverse outcomes in women with a previous cesarean with twin or singleton pregnancies. Study design: This was a multicenter retrospective cohort study between the years 1996 and 2000. Subjects were identified by ICD-9 code. Trained research nurses collected medical record data on the outcome of VBAC attempts, and clinical outcomes, including uterine rupture and major operative injuries. We used bivariate and multivariable techniques to assess the association between twins and the outcomes. Results: Of 25,005 patients with at least I previous cesarean, there were 535 twin pregnancies and 24,307 singleton pregnancies. Compared with patients with singleton gestations, patients with twins were less likely to attempt a VBAC (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.4), but no more likely to have a VBAC failure (AOR 1.1, 95% CI 0.8-1.6), a uterine rupture (AOR 1.2, 95% CI 0.3-4.6), or a major maternal morbidity (AOR 1.6, 95% CI 0.7-3.7).. Conclusion: Women with twin gestations are less likely to attempt a VBAC, but they are no more likely to fail a VBAC trial or experience a major morbid event compared with women with singleton gestations. (C) 2005 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1050 / 1055
页数:6
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 2004, OBSTET GYNECOL, V104, P203
[2]  
BENIRSCHKE K, 2004, MATERNAL FETAL MED P, P55
[3]  
CHERVENAK FA, 1984, AM J OBSTET GYNECOL, V148, P1
[4]   Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery [J].
Landon, MB ;
Hauth, JC ;
Leveno, KJ ;
Spong, CY ;
Leindecker, S ;
Varner, MW ;
Moawad, AH ;
Caritis, SN ;
Harper, M ;
Wapner, RJ ;
Sorokin, Y ;
Miodovnik, M ;
Carpenter, M ;
Peaceman, AM ;
O'Sullivan, MJ ;
Sibai, B ;
Langer, O ;
Thorp, JM ;
Ramin, SM ;
Mercer, BM ;
Gabbe, SG ;
Iams, J ;
Johnson, F ;
Meadows, S ;
Walker, H ;
Rouse, D ;
Northen, A ;
Tate, S ;
Bloom, S ;
McCampbell, J ;
Bradford, D ;
Belfort, M ;
Porter, F ;
Oshiro, B ;
Anderson, K ;
Guzman, A ;
Hibbard, J ;
Jones, P ;
Ramos-Brinson, M ;
Moran, M ;
Scott, D ;
Lain, K ;
Cotroneo, M ;
Fischer, D ;
Luce, M ;
Meis, P ;
Swain, M ;
Moorefield, C ;
Lanier, K ;
Steele, L .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (25) :2581-2589
[5]   Obstetric outcomes in women with two prior cesarean deliveries: Is vaginal birth after cesarean delivery a viable option? [J].
Macones, GA ;
Cahill, A ;
Pare, E ;
Stamilio, DM ;
Ratcliffe, S ;
Stevens, E ;
Sammel, M ;
Peipert, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 192 (04) :1223-1229
[6]   Diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus does not influence the success rates for vaginal birth after cesarean delivery [J].
Marchiano, D ;
Elkousy, M ;
Stevens, E ;
Peipert, J ;
Macones, G .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2004, 190 (03) :790-796
[7]  
Martin Joyce A, 2003, Natl Vital Stat Rep, V52, P1
[8]   Vaginal birth after cesarean section in twin gestation [J].
Miller, DA ;
Mullin, P ;
Hou, D ;
Paul, RH .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (01) :194-198
[9]  
Myles T, 2001, J Matern Fetal Med, V10, P171, DOI 10.1080/714904319
[10]  
Sansregret Andree, 2003, J Obstet Gynaecol Can, V25, P294