Using analytic network process and turbo particle swarm optimization algorithm for non-balanced supply chain planning considering supplier relationship management

被引:8
作者
Che, Z. H. [1 ]
Chiang, Tzu-An [2 ]
Che, Zhen-Guo [3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taipei Univ Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taipei 106, Taiwan
[2] Natl Taipei Coll Business, Dept Business Adm, Taipei, Taiwan
[3] Natl Chiao Tung Univ, Inst Informat Management, Hsinchu, Taiwan
关键词
Analytic network process; non-balanced supply chain; particle swarm optimization; supplier relationship management; supply chain planning; QUANTITY ALLOCATION; MULTIPLE CRITERIA; VENDOR SELECTION; MODEL; LOGISTICS; STRATEGY; QUALITY; SYSTEMS; METRICS; ANP;
D O I
10.1177/0142331211402901
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Supply chain planning has been regarded as a key strategic decision-making activity for the enterprises under the current business circumstances. From the point of supply chain planning, the important issues are to find suitable and quality partners and to decide upon an appropriate production-distribution plan. In this study, hence, we address to develop a decision methodology for supply chain planning in multi-echelon non-balanced supply chain system, taking into account such four criteria as cost, quality, delivery and supplier relationship management and considering quantity discount and capacity constraints. The proposed methodology is based on the analytic network process and turbo particle swarm optimization (TPSO), to evaluate partners and to determine an optimal supply chain network pattern and production-distribution mode. Finally, to demonstrate the performance of the proposed TPSO algorithm, comparative numerical experiments are performed by TPSO, particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm (GA). Empirical analysis results demonstrate that TPSO can outperform PSO and GA in non-balanced supply chain planning problems.
引用
收藏
页码:720 / 735
页数:16
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Particle swarm optimisation based Diophantine equation solver [J].
Abraham, Siby ;
Sanyal, Sugata ;
Sanglikar, Mukund .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTATION, 2010, 2 (02) :100-114
[2]   Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach [J].
Agarwal, Ashish ;
Shankar, Ravi ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2006, 173 (01) :211-225
[3]   Multiobjective Particle Swarm Algorithm With Fuzzy Clustering for Electrical Power Dispatch [J].
Agrawal, Shubham ;
Panigrahi, B. K. ;
Tiwari, Manoj Kumar .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2008, 12 (05) :529-541
[4]   Interactive particle swarm: A Pareto-adaptive metaheuristic to multiobjective optimization [J].
Agrawal, Shubham ;
Dashora, Yogesh ;
Tiwari, Manoj Kumar ;
Son, Young-Jun .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS, 2008, 38 (02) :258-277
[5]   An integrated approach for logistic and vendor managed inventory in supply chain [J].
Arora, V. ;
Chan, F. T. S. ;
Tiwari, M. K. .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2010, 37 (01) :39-44
[6]   On the optimal control of the steel annealing processes as a two-stage hybrid systems via PSO algorithms [J].
Arumugam, M. Senthil ;
Murthy, G. Ramana ;
Loo, C. K. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIO-INSPIRED COMPUTATION, 2009, 1 (03) :198-209
[7]   The influence of power driven buyer/seller relationships on supply chain satisfaction [J].
Benton, WC ;
Maloni, M .
JOURNAL OF OPERATIONS MANAGEMENT, 2005, 23 (01) :1-22
[8]   Particle swarm optimization training algorithm for ANNs in stage prediction of Shing Mun River [J].
Chau, K. W. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2006, 329 (3-4) :363-367
[9]   Supplier selection and supply quantity allocation of common and non-common parts with multiple criteria under multiple products [J].
Che, Z. H. ;
Wang, H. S. .
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2008, 55 (01) :110-133
[10]   Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and particle swarm optimisation for balanced and defective supply chain problems considering WEEE/RoHS directives [J].
Che, Z. H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2010, 48 (11) :3355-3381