A comparison of hysteroscopy and hysterosalpingography

被引：18

作者：

Gaglione, R ^{[1
]}

Valentini, AL ^{[1
]}

Pistilli, E ^{[1
]}

Nuzzi, NP ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] CATHOLIC UNIV,DEPT RADIOL,ROME,ITALY

来源：

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS | 1996年 / 52卷 / 02期

关键词：

hysteroscopy; hysterosalpingography; infertility;

D O I：

10.1016/0020-7292(95)02555-3

中图分类号：

R71 [妇产科学];

学科分类号：

100211 ;

摘要：

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic reliability of hysteroscopy (HSC) and hysterosalpingography (HSG) in patients suffering from primary and secondary infertility. Method: Seventy women (50 with primary and 20 with secondary infertility) undergoing HSC and HSG were prospectively studied and the diagnostic capacity of the two techniques was compared. Results: HSG proved to have a sensitivity of 79.1% and a specificity of 81.8%, with an 18.1% false-positive rate and a 18.9% false-negative rate. Conclusion: HSG is of exclusive importance in the assessment of tubal morphology and function and has a secondary and complementary role to HSC in the inspection of the uterine cavity and tubal ostia.

引用

页码：151 / 153

页数：3

共 8 条

[1] THE DIAGNOSTIC-VALUE OF HYSTEROSALPINGOGRAPHY AND HYSTEROSCOPY IN INFERTILITY INVESTIGATION [J].

FAYEZ, JA ;

MUTIE, G ;

SCHNEIDER, PJ .

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1987, 156 (03) :558-560

[2]

GAGLIONE R, 1994, 70TH C IT SOC OBST G

[3]

KESSLER I, 1986, FERTIL STERIL, V46, P709

[4]

LITTA P, 1993, GINECOL CLIN, V14, P100

[5]

PALLA GP, 1985, JUN C OBST GYN PORT

[6]

Simon P., 1993, Journal de Gynecologie Obstetrique et Biologie de la Reproduction, V22, P141

[7]

TAYLOR PJ, 1977, J REPROD MED, V8, P339

[8]

ZHIOUA F, 1993, REV FR GYNECOL OBSTE, V88, P4

← 1 →