Diagnostic performance of fractional excretion of urea and fractional excretion of sodium in the evaluations of patients with acute kidney injury with or without diuretic treatment

被引:98
作者
Pepin, Marie-Noelle [1 ]
Bouchard, Josee [1 ]
Legault, Louis [1 ]
Ethier, Jean [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Ctr Hosp, Dept Nephrol, Montreal, PQ H2X 3J4, Canada
关键词
fractional excretion of urea; fractional excretion of sodium; acute kidney injury; diuretics; diagnostic accuracy; sensitivity; specificity;
D O I
10.1053/j.ajkd.2007.07.001
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: The accuracy of fractional excretion of sodium (FENa) for the diagnosis of transient acute kidney injury (AKI) caused by decreased kidney perfusion is reported to be low in patients administered diuretics. Study Design: This is a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing the performance of fractional excretion of urea (FEur) with that of FENa to distinguish between transient and persistent AKI. Setting & Participants: 99 patients hospitalized at a tertiary-care center who developed AKI ( >= 30% increase in serum creatinine level from baseline within 1 week). Index Test: FEur and FENa were calculated for each patient. Reference Test & Measurements: Patients were classified as having transient or persistent AKI according to the clinical context and whether serum creatinine level returned to baseline within 7 days. Each group also was subdivided according to exposure to diuretics. FEur of 35% or less and FENa of 1 % or less were used to define transient AKI. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curves were generated for each index test. Results: Sensitivity and specificity of FEur were 48% and 75% in patients not administered diuretics and 79% and 33% in patients administered diuretics. Sensitivity and specificity of FENa were 78% and 75% in patients not administered diuretics and 58% and 81 % in those administered diuretics. Receiver operating characteristic curves did not identify a better diagnostic cutoff value for FEur or FENa. Limitations: Small sample size, variable exposure to diuretics, and a high proportion of preexisting chronic kidney disease. Conclusions: In patients without diuretic use, FENa is better able to distinguish transient from persistent AKI. In patients administered diuretics, this distinction cannot be made accurately by means of FENa. FEur cannot be used as an alternative tool because it lacks specificity.
引用
收藏
页码:566 / 573
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条