Variability between methods to determine ANA, anti-dsDNA and anti-ENA autoantibodies: a collaborative study with the biomedical industry

This study was performed by the Italian Society of Laboratory Medicine (SIMeL) in order to establish the variability between the different analytical systems currently used in clinical laboratories for the detection of autoantibodies diagnostic of systemic autoimmune disease. Sixteen industrial, and two university laboratories participated in this study which entailed the determination of anti-nuclear (ANA), anti-dsDNA and anti-ENA antibodies in 11 sera from patients with clinically diagnosed systemic rheumatic disease, using reagents produced by these companies and different methodologies (indirect immunofluorescence, immunoenzymatic assay, counterimmunolectrophoresis, immune and western blotting). We found 93.5% agreement between the methods used for the detection of ANA, 85.2% for anti-dsDNA antibodies, and 86.9% for anti-ENA. antibodies. Among the anti-ENA antibodies, regardless of the method used, detection percentages were excellent for anti-RNP and anti-SSB/La (100%), good for anti-SSA/Ro (93%), but unacceptable for the anti-Jo-1 (67%), anti-Scl70 and anti-Sm (47%) antibodies. This further stresses the need for rigorous standardisation of commercial reagents and analytical procedures, as well as the introduction of external quality assessment (EQA) programs, and a complete definition of operative protocols adjusted to the sensitivity and specificity of the various methods. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.