What is it like to be someone else? Simulation and empathy

被引:29
作者
Ravenscroft, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
来源
RATIO-NEW SERIES | 1998年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1467-9329.00062
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
This paper explores two models of empathy. One model places theory centre stage; the other emphasises our capacity to re-enact fragments of another's mental life. I argue that considerations of parsimony strongly support the latter, simulative approach. My results have consequences for the current debate between the theory-theory and simulation theory. That debate is standardly conceived as a debate about mental state attribution rather than about empathy. However, on the simulation model, empathy and mental state attribution involve a common mechanism. Thus the strength of the simulative approach to empathy lends considerable credence to the simulation account of mental state attribution. Considerations of empathy are thus surprisingly important in the philosophy of mind. © Blackwell Publishers Ltd. 1998.
引用
收藏
页码:170 / 185
页数:16
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, FOLK PSYCHOL
[2]  
ARMSTRONG DM, 1968, MATERIALIST THEORY M
[3]   DOES THE AUTISTIC-CHILD HAVE A THEORY OF MIND [J].
BARONCOHEN, S ;
LESLIE, AM ;
FRITH, U .
COGNITION, 1985, 21 (01) :37-46
[4]  
CARRUTHERS P, 1996, THEORIES THEORIES MI
[5]   IMPLICIT UNDERSTANDING OF BELIEF [J].
CLEMENTS, WA ;
PERNER, J .
COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT, 1994, 9 (04) :377-395
[6]  
CURRIE G, 1996, THEORIES THEORIES MI
[7]  
Davies M., 1995, MENTAL SIMULATION
[8]  
GOLDMAN AI, 1995, MENTAL SIMULATION
[9]  
Gordon Robert, 1995, MENTAL SIMULATION
[10]   Simulation and cognitive penetrability [J].
Heal, J .
MIND & LANGUAGE, 1996, 11 (01) :44-67